Re: [WebDNA] Server load

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100458
interpreted = N
texte = these are GREAT questions! I'm working on a reply, but it's going to take a while. I have some really far out there ideas for you, but typing it up while thinking in Ruby isn't working for me right now. On Aug 7, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Frank Nordberg wrote: > It's not the best time to open a thread like this since I'm leaving > for a week's vacation later today and may not follow the (hopefully > lively) discussion as closely as I'd like to. But this takes up so > much of my brain's processor capacity at the moment I just can't let > it rest. ;-) > > I've come to a point where I have to recode most of the WebDNA for > my sites. Almost all my code is written to be compact - that is to > require as little memory and as few databases as possible. That made > a lot of sense when I originally opened the sites - back in the old > days when disc space and RAM were expensive and WebDNA's cache could > only hold a limited number of databases. > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Paul Willis 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Server load ("Brian B. Burton" 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Terry Wilson 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Patrick Junkroski 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Server load ("Brian B. Burton" 2008)
  9. [WebDNA] Server load (Frank Nordberg 2008)
these are GREAT questions! I'm working on a reply, but it's going to take a while. I have some really far out there ideas for you, but typing it up while thinking in Ruby isn't working for me right now. On Aug 7, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Frank Nordberg wrote: > It's not the best time to open a thread like this since I'm leaving > for a week's vacation later today and may not follow the (hopefully > lively) discussion as closely as I'd like to. But this takes up so > much of my brain's processor capacity at the moment I just can't let > it rest. ;-) > > I've come to a point where I have to recode most of the WebDNA for > my sites. Almost all my code is written to be compact - that is to > require as little memory and as few databases as possible. That made > a lot of sense when I originally opened the sites - back in the old > days when disc space and RAM were expensive and WebDNA's cache could > only hold a limited number of databases. > "Brian B. Burton"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

&max= (2003) Universal root for WC errors? (1997) Show your support (2002) Beta 18 (1997) Date search bug (1997) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) Pop-Up Redirects (1998) Shownext problems (1999) Sendmail (1999) foriegn characters and webcatalog (1997) [WebDNA] USPS shipping calculator (2012) 4.0 Mac OS 9 -> 4.5 Mac OS X (2002) [append] vs. [appendfile] delta + question? (1997) Escape the Root! (2002) Whats going on with my SERIAL NUMBER??? (1998) auto adding SKUs w/DB helper (1998) Email (1998) Showif date > other date (2004) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - syntax to convert date (1997) [HTML*] (a proposition) (1997)