Re: [WebDNA] [hideif]'s not working in [sendmail]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2008
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 101207
interpreted = N
texte = Hi Donovan,You're right! Just got through a battery of testing and found the problem seems to be with the [url] tags in the initial [hideif]s.this code doesn't hide things:[hideif [url][Comments1][/url]=]______________________________________________Library News______________________________________________[hideif ||[url][raw][Comments1][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments1][/url]|] [Comments1][/hideif][hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/url]|] [Comments2][/hideif][hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/url]|] [Comments3][/hideif][/hideif]this code does:[hideif [Comments1]=[raw][Comments1][/raw]][hideif [Comments1]=]______________________________________________Library News______________________________________________[Comments1][hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/url]|] [Comments2][/hideif][hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/url]|] [Comments3][/hideif][/hideif][/hideif]On Oct 20, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:> Suzanne Swift wrote:>>> Hi Donovan,>> I tried out what you suggested and verified that no data was >> coming through the Comments fields. Then tried eliminating the >> pipes (||'s) which turned out to be the problem. (Thanks Bob >> bringing them to my attention!)>> Regards,>> Suzanne>> Well, glad you got it fixed. :-) However, unless there is some wierd > 3.x issue,> the double pipe should be perfectly valid.. (however redundant) ;-)>> in otherwords (for Comments1 for example), if> the value of "[Comments1]" equals "[Comments1]".. or if it> equals "". The code below *should* keep the raw [Comments1] hidden.>> By taking out the double || you are causing that code to *always* > hide the comments.> By taking out one of the double ||'s, it is only going to hide that> code when [Comments1] = (literally) "[Comments1]".>> So I'm not convinced that your code is fixed. ;-)>> I'm not trying to argue with your "working" system Suzanne ;-), I am> just trying to keep the information clear on this public forum.>> The code containing the double || is valid, so in my mind, there is > something> else going on...>> However, as I stated, it's redundant since the outer container is > hiding the> entire block of code if the first comments1 is blank.. so, in the > end, the> double pipes are not needed anyway. (but they should not break > anything)>> Have I confused you yet? ;-)>> Donovan>>>>> [hideif [url][Comments1][/url]=]> ______________________________________________> News> ______________________________________________>> [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments1][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments1][/ > url]|] [Comments1][/hideif]> [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/ > url]|] [Comments2][/hideif]> [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/ > url]|] [Comments3][/hideif]> [/hideif]>>> Donovan>>>> -- > Donovan D. Brooke PH/FAX: 1 (608) 291-2024> ----------------------------------------------> VP> WebDNA Software Corporation> 16192 Coastal Highway> Lewes, DE 19958> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list
.> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Hi Donovan,You're right! Just got through a battery of testing and found the problem seems to be with the [url] tags in the initial [hideif]s.this code doesn't hide things:[hideif [url][Comments1][/url]=]______________________________________________Library News______________________________________________[hideif ||[url][raw][Comments1][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments1][/url]|] [Comments1][/hideif][hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/url]|] [Comments2][/hideif][hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/url]|] [Comments3][/hideif][/hideif]this code does:[hideif [Comments1]=[raw][Comments1][/raw]][hideif [Comments1]=]______________________________________________Library News______________________________________________[Comments1][hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/url]|] [Comments2][/hideif][hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/url]|] [Comments3][/hideif][/hideif][/hideif]On Oct 20, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:> Suzanne Swift wrote:>>> Hi Donovan,>> I tried out what you suggested and verified that no data was >> coming through the Comments fields. Then tried eliminating the >> pipes (||'s) which turned out to be the problem. (Thanks Bob >> bringing them to my attention!)>> Regards,>> Suzanne>> Well, glad you got it fixed. :-) However, unless there is some wierd > 3.x issue,> the double pipe should be perfectly valid.. (however redundant) ;-)>> in otherwords (for Comments1 for example), if> the value of "[Comments1]" equals "[Comments1]".. or if it> equals "". The code below *should* keep the raw [Comments1] hidden.>> By taking out the double || you are causing that code to *always* > hide the comments.> By taking out one of the double ||'s, it is only going to hide that> code when [Comments1] = (literally) "[Comments1]".>> So I'm not convinced that your code is fixed. ;-)>> I'm not trying to argue with your "working" system Suzanne ;-), I am> just trying to keep the information clear on this public forum.>> The code containing the double || is valid, so in my mind, there is > something> else going on...>> However, as I stated, it's redundant since the outer container is > hiding the> entire block of code if the first comments1 is blank.. so, in the > end, the> double pipes are not needed anyway. (but they should not break > anything)>> Have I confused you yet? ;-)>> Donovan>>>>> [hideif [url][Comments1][/url]=]> ______________________________________________> News> ______________________________________________>> [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments1][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments1][/ > url]|] [Comments1][/hideif]> [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/ > url]|] [Comments2][/hideif]> [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/ > url]|] [Comments3][/hideif]> [/hideif]>>> Donovan>>>> -- > Donovan D. Brooke PH/FAX: 1 (608) 291-2024> ----------------------------------------------> VP> WebDNA Software Corporation> 16192 Coastal Highway> Lewes, DE 19958> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Suzanne Swift
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
return missing item (was:WebCat Sales) (1997)
Username for Admin Group (1997)
Help name our technology! (1997)
tpl and Explorer (1998)
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
WebMerchant 1.6 and SHTML (1997)
[moveFile] Question (1999)
find with exceptions (1997)
AuthNumber, ResponseText etc (2005)
re: Large databases in WebCat (1997)
[SMSI] WebDNA is too good to go away! (2006)
quotes (2004)
a new bug? (1999)
problems with 2 tags (1997)
PCS Frames (1997)
AOL and referrers on target=_blank (2000)
Understanding texta (1997)
Pirated WebCat? NOT... (2003)
GuestBook example (1997)
Moment of Thanks (1997)