Re: [WebDNA] [hideif]'s not working in [sendmail]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2008
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 101207
interpreted = N
texte = Hi Donovan, You're right! Just got through a battery of testing and found the problem seems to be with the [url] tags in the initial [hideif]s. this code doesn't hide things: [hideif [url][Comments1][/url]=] ______________________________________________ Library News ______________________________________________ [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments1][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments1][/url]|] [Comments1][/hideif] [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/url]|] [Comments2][/hideif] [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/url]|] [Comments3][/hideif] [/hideif] this code does: [hideif [Comments1]=[raw][Comments1][/raw]][hideif [Comments1]=] ______________________________________________ Library News ______________________________________________ [Comments1] [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/url]|] [Comments2][/hideif] [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/url]|] [Comments3][/hideif] [/hideif][/hideif] On Oct 20, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Suzanne Swift wrote: > >> Hi Donovan, >> I tried out what you suggested and verified that no data was >> coming through the Comments fields. Then tried eliminating the >> pipes (||'s) which turned out to be the problem. (Thanks Bob >> bringing them to my attention!) >> Regards, >> Suzanne > > Well, glad you got it fixed. :-) However, unless there is some wierd > 3.x issue, > the double pipe should be perfectly valid.. (however redundant) ;-) > > in otherwords (for Comments1 for example), if > the value of "[Comments1]" equals "[Comments1]".. or if it > equals "". The code below *should* keep the raw [Comments1] hidden. > > By taking out the double || you are causing that code to *always* > hide the comments. > By taking out one of the double ||'s, it is only going to hide that > code when [Comments1] = (literally) "[Comments1]". > > So I'm not convinced that your code is fixed. ;-) > > I'm not trying to argue with your "working" system Suzanne ;-), I am > just trying to keep the information clear on this public forum. > > The code containing the double || is valid, so in my mind, there is > something > else going on... > > However, as I stated, it's redundant since the outer container is > hiding the > entire block of code if the first comments1 is blank.. so, in the > end, the > double pipes are not needed anyway. (but they should not break > anything) > > Have I confused you yet? ;-) > > Donovan > > > > > [hideif [url][Comments1][/url]=] > ______________________________________________ > News > ______________________________________________ > > [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments1][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments1][/ > url]|] [Comments1][/hideif] > [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/ > url]|] [Comments2][/hideif] > [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/ > url]|] [Comments3][/hideif] > [/hideif] > > > Donovan > > > > -- > Donovan D. Brooke PH/FAX: 1 (608) 291-2024 > ---------------------------------------------- > VP > WebDNA Software Corporation > 16192 Coastal Highway > Lewes, DE 19958 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Hi Donovan, You're right! Just got through a battery of testing and found the problem seems to be with the [url] tags in the initial [hideif]s. this code doesn't hide things: [hideif [url][Comments1][/url]=] ______________________________________________ Library News ______________________________________________ [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments1][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments1][/url]|] [Comments1][/hideif] [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/url]|] [Comments2][/hideif] [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/url]|] [Comments3][/hideif] [/hideif] this code does: [hideif [Comments1]=[raw][Comments1][/raw]][hideif [Comments1]=] ______________________________________________ Library News ______________________________________________ [Comments1] [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/url]|] [Comments2][/hideif] [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/url]|] [Comments3][/hideif] [/hideif][/hideif] On Oct 20, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Suzanne Swift wrote: > >> Hi Donovan, >> I tried out what you suggested and verified that no data was >> coming through the Comments fields. Then tried eliminating the >> pipes (||'s) which turned out to be the problem. (Thanks Bob >> bringing them to my attention!) >> Regards, >> Suzanne > > Well, glad you got it fixed. :-) However, unless there is some wierd > 3.x issue, > the double pipe should be perfectly valid.. (however redundant) ;-) > > in otherwords (for Comments1 for example), if > the value of "[Comments1]" equals "[Comments1]".. or if it > equals "". The code below *should* keep the raw [Comments1] hidden. > > By taking out the double || you are causing that code to *always* > hide the comments. > By taking out one of the double ||'s, it is only going to hide that > code when [Comments1] = (literally) "[Comments1]". > > So I'm not convinced that your code is fixed. ;-) > > I'm not trying to argue with your "working" system Suzanne ;-), I am > just trying to keep the information clear on this public forum. > > The code containing the double || is valid, so in my mind, there is > something > else going on... > > However, as I stated, it's redundant since the outer container is > hiding the > entire block of code if the first comments1 is blank.. so, in the > end, the > double pipes are not needed anyway. (but they should not break > anything) > > Have I confused you yet? ;-) > > Donovan > > > > > [hideif [url][Comments1][/url]=] > ______________________________________________ > News > ______________________________________________ > > [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments1][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments1][/ > url]|] [Comments1][/hideif] > [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments2][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments2][/ > url]|] [Comments2][/hideif] > [hideif ||[url][raw][Comments3][/raw][/url]|^|[url][Comments3][/ > url]|] [Comments3][/hideif] > [/hideif] > > > Donovan > > > > -- > Donovan D. Brooke PH/FAX: 1 (608) 291-2024 > ---------------------------------------------- > VP > WebDNA Software Corporation > 16192 Coastal Highway > Lewes, DE 19958 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Suzanne Swift
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[cart]'s ever get recycled? (2000)
Possible Bug 4.51 (2004)
Webcat 3.0.7 & Webmerchant (2002)
replace problem (1999)
2.1b2 was SLOW ... but 2.1b3 is FAST! (1997)
.html processing? (1998)
Webten + Webcat running smooth (1998)
Nested tags count question (1997)
Apache suffix mapping for .tpl (2000)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
2.0 Info (1997)
Authenticate (2000)
anyone interested in doing an open-source WebCat basedforum? (2002)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
Founditems context returning only 1 item (1997)
form data submission gets truncated (1997)
Re[2]: How true is this? (1999)
[WebDNA] PCI Vulnerability testing (2009)
Web Catalog 2 demo (1997)
suffix mapping for NT? (1997)