Re: [WebDNA] [sendmail] inside a [founditems] loop ... please
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103555
interpreted = N
texte =
My experience is that when I send a lot of mail all at once, WebDNA writes them to disk immediately, but the serv= er chugs them out from the mail folder one at a time, so it might take an hour for a few hundred to go.=A0Would that send= up a red flag? I don't think it would.=A0They are individual mails, generated in a founditems, like yours, as opposed to a = list of addresses in a single mail's CC or BCC field. Those are the ones ISPs like to squash (for good reason).=A0
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:17:14 -0600
Govinda <govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 6,= 2009, at 8:45 AM, Govinda wrote:
>>
>>> Happy Sunday!
>>>
>&= gt;> We use 3rd party listservers for the big stuff, but I
>>>have a small
>>> list of c= ustomers (~500) who we need to send a message
>>>to very
>>> occasionally. I have a [sendma= il] inside a [founditems]
>>>loop=20
>>> inside a [search .. max=3D25], so we only send 25 emails=
>>>at a time.
>>> The page has a <meta refresh ... > set to refresh every
>>= ;>60 seconds
>>> (and so then send the next batch of 25 emails). I am
>>>just writing <= br>>>> to ask you folks with more experience about how servers
>>>expect to
>>> = see email come and go so as not to end up on some
>>>blacklist.. (or
>>> worse?)-
>&= gt;>
>>> Is my design safe?=20 Should I send even less than 25 at a
>>>time?
>>= > Should I increase the interval to greater than 60 secs.?
>>> Other
>>> comments?
>= ;>>
>>> ------------
>>> Govinda
>>> govinda.webdnatalk@g= mail.com
>
> On Sep 6, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Jeffrey Jones wrote:
>
>> It is incredibly easy= to end up on a blacklist. I would
>>outsource
>> the message, so your server does not = get the blame.
>>
>> -Jeff
>
> OK, I hear you Jeff.
>
> Does anyone = have any other input? ..especially anyone
>doing what I am, without issue?
> I mean I really want thi= s to work without having to
>outsource, for so small a need.
> If I reduce to 10 emails at a time?
>=
> -G
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> This me= ssage is sent to you because you are subscribed
>to
> the mailing list <talk@webdna.us>.
> To un= subscribe, E-mail to: <talk-leave@webdna.us>
> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list= /talk@webdna.us
> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
> Bug Reporting:
>http= ://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288
=A0=
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
My experience is that when I send a lot of mail all at once, WebDNA writes them to disk immediately, but the serv= er chugs them out from the mail folder one at a time, so it might take an hour for a few hundred to go.=A0Would that send= up a red flag? I don't think it would.=A0They are individual mails, generated in a founditems, like yours, as opposed to a = list of addresses in a single mail's CC or BCC field. Those are the ones ISPs like to squash (for good reason).=A0
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:17:14 -0600
Govinda <govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 6,= 2009, at 8:45 AM, Govinda wrote:
>>
>>> Happy Sunday!
>>>
>&= gt;> We use 3rd party listservers for the big stuff, but I
>>>have a small
>>> list of c= ustomers (~500) who we need to send a message
>>>to very
>>> occasionally. I have a [sendma= il] inside a [founditems]
>>>loop=20
>>> inside a [search .. max=3D25], so we only send 25 emails=
>>>at a time.
>>> The page has a <meta refresh ... > set to refresh every
>>= ;>60 seconds
>>> (and so then send the next batch of 25 emails). I am
>>>just writing <= br>>>> to ask you folks with more experience about how servers
>>>expect to
>>> = see email come and go so as not to end up on some
>>>blacklist.. (or
>>> worse?)-
>&= gt;>
>>> Is my design safe?=20 Should I send even less than 25 at a
>>>time?
>>= > Should I increase the interval to greater than 60 secs.?
>>> Other
>>> comments?
>= ;>>
>>> ------------
>>> Govinda
>>> govinda.webdnatalk@g= mail.com
>
> On Sep 6, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Jeffrey Jones wrote:
>
>> It is incredibly easy= to end up on a blacklist. I would
>>outsource
>> the message, so your server does not = get the blame.
>>
>> -Jeff
>
> OK, I hear you Jeff.
>
> Does anyone = have any other input? ..especially anyone
>doing what I am, without issue?
> I mean I really want thi= s to work without having to
>outsource, for so small a need.
> If I reduce to 10 emails at a time?
>=
> -G
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> This me= ssage is sent to you because you are subscribed
>to
> the mailing list <talk@webdna.us>.
> To un= subscribe, E-mail to: <talk-leave@webdna.us>
> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list= /talk@webdna.us
> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
> Bug Reporting:
>http= ://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288
=A0= DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Help name our technology! (1997)
Math (1997)
Stopping NT WebCat service (1998)
Email notification to one of multiple vendors ? (1997)
Re:Merging databases (1997)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
Problem 2 of 2 (was: Shipping Confusion) (2000)
WebCat2b12plugin - [search] is broken ... not! (1997)
Cookies and WebTV (1999)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] (1997)
all db's in one folder and protected (1998)
Formating found categories (1997)
return missing item (was:WebCat Sales) (1997)
Closing Databases (1998)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
[OT] XML data to tab delimited database (2003)
[WebDNA] Correct returnraw syntax? (2011)
Running WebCat from a CD-ROM (1997)
Pithy questions on webcommerce & siteedit (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997)