I also support non-collapsing delimiters, although at this point, I have written code to work around th= e collapsing behavior, so I'd have to rack my brain to remember where that was and what the ramifications would be to h= ave it behave as non-collapsing.
I have never used the [delimiter] tag to display the delimiter, so can't comment on that part.=A0
Terry
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:59:31 -0600
Go= vinda <govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> To get a clearer picture of what WebDNA is do= ing, try
>>this code:
>>
>> [text]t_words=3D1something2some_other34one_= more5[/text]
>> <p>
>> [listwords
>>words=3D[t_words]&delimiters=3D12345][word][de= limiter][/
>> listwords]
>> </p>
>>
>> The result of this code is:
>>= ;
>> something1some_other2one_more4
>
>
> pointed out this clearly (thanks Brian!) now it
&g= t;(current behavior) seems fine to me.
> Mostly we just want to not get stuck wondering what the
>heck is = supposed to happen. (i.e. clear thorough docs
>anywhere there could be more than one interpretation.)
> <= br>> I add my vote for allowing us to tell webdna NOT to
>collapse iterations when the [word] on that iterat= ion is
>[blank] (for more than just tabs, of we wish).
>
> ------------
> Govinda
> = govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------= -----------
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed
>to
> the mailing list <talk@w= ebdna.us>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <talk-leave@webdna.us>
> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/= list/talk@webdna.us
> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
> Bug Reporting:
>http= ://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288
=A0=