Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104083
interpreted = N
texte = Govinda, Thanks for your suggestion, but [ReplaceFoundItems] does not help. = WebDNA goes on it's knees; even with or without the [foundItems]. Palle On 02/12/2009, at 21.50, Govinda wrote: > just a quick thought/test - try that again but like this: >=20 > [search db=3Dl4.db&nel4_statusdata=3Ddummy&asl4_serialsort=3D1][numFound= ] > = [foundItems][ReplaceFoundItems]l4_index=3D[index][/ReplaceFoundItems][/fou= ndItems] > [/search] >=20 > using [founditems] to wrap [ReplaceFoundItems] is dumb, but how to = get the next val for the [l4_index] field with *min.* impact on = webdna.. hmmm... > Anyway, I *assume* that you are still better off with my above = suggestion than with the nested [replace] which has to find the record = all over again.. on each and every iteration. >=20 > or take it down and do it in something offline (mac? filemaker?) and = then fire it up again online.. having written code to populate the new = records *as you create them*, at the time you [append], [replace .. = &append=3DT]) >=20 > -G >=20 > On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: >=20 >> Hi all, >>=20 >> I got a DB which has 11 fields and more that 700.000 lines of data. >>=20 >> Now I need to add a new field and I need to populate this field with = an index from the number 1 to the most recent number which for example = is 700.000. >>=20 >> The number 1 is the first lines of data within this BD and the = 700.000 is the most recent added line of data. >>=20 >> If have done some test and sand-boxing and every time WebDNA goes = into it's knees. >>=20 >> I need some good advise from you all to figure out the best solution. >>=20 >> I look forward to your suggestions. >>=20 >> **** this one is rough and breaks WebDNA **** >> [search = db=3Dl4.db&nel4_statusdata=3Ddummy&asl4_serialsort=3D1][numFound][foundIte= ms] >> [replace db=3Dl4.db&eql4_skudata=3D[l4_sku]]l4_index=3D[index][/replace= ] >> [/foundItems][/search] >> **** snip **** >>=20 >>=20 >> Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >=20 > ------------ > Govinda > govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >=20 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Donovan 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (chas conquest 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Marc Thompson 2009)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  28. [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
Govinda, Thanks for your suggestion, but [replacefounditems] does not help. = WebDNA goes on it's knees; even with or without the [founditems]. Palle On 02/12/2009, at 21.50, Govinda wrote: > just a quick thought/test - try that again but like this: >=20 > [search db=3Dl4.db&nel4_statusdata=3Ddummy&asl4_serialsort=3D1][numFound= ] > = [founditems][replacefounditems]l4_index=3D[index][/ReplaceFoundItems][/fou= ndItems] > [/search] >=20 > using [founditems] to wrap [replacefounditems] is dumb, but how to = get the next val for the [l4_index] field with *min.* impact on = webdna.. hmmm... > Anyway, I *assume* that you are still better off with my above = suggestion than with the nested [replace] which has to find the record = all over again.. on each and every iteration. >=20 > or take it down and do it in something offline (mac? filemaker?) and = then fire it up again online.. having written code to populate the new = records *as you create them*, at the time you [append], [replace .. = &append=3DT]) >=20 > -G >=20 > On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: >=20 >> Hi all, >>=20 >> I got a DB which has 11 fields and more that 700.000 lines of data. >>=20 >> Now I need to add a new field and I need to populate this field with = an index from the number 1 to the most recent number which for example = is 700.000. >>=20 >> The number 1 is the first lines of data within this BD and the = 700.000 is the most recent added line of data. >>=20 >> If have done some test and sand-boxing and every time WebDNA goes = into it's knees. >>=20 >> I need some good advise from you all to figure out the best solution. >>=20 >> I look forward to your suggestions. >>=20 >> **** this one is rough and breaks WebDNA **** >> [search = db=3Dl4.db&nel4_statusdata=3Ddummy&asl4_serialsort=3D1][numFound][foundIte= ms] >> [replace db=3Dl4.db&eql4_skudata=3D[l4_sku]]l4_index=3D[index][/replace= ] >> [/foundItems][/search] >> **** snip **** >>=20 >>=20 >> Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >=20 > ------------ > Govinda > govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >=20 Palle Bo Nielsen

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Authenticate (1997) What Country (2004) Occasional crashes with $remove (1997) .cgi with webdna (2004) Re:no template caching (1997) question: back button prevention (1997) Stopping bad HTML propagation ? (1997) Nested vs conditional (1997) [WebDNA] behavior of [thisurl] in the context of 'mod_rewrite' (2012) [ListFiles] context & alias (1997) Limit on nested [ShowIf]'s? (1997) OT Server capacity (2003) Roundup function? (1997) Show all from database (2001) Re:WebDNA Writer Needed (1997) Find one not all, code not working (2003) WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997) Javascript and Pull Down menus (1999) WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997) [BULK] [WebDNA] test (2011)