Re: [WebDNA] [replacefounditems] fails
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104147
interpreted = N
texte = > I believe that is true, without the raw printouts there is no > verification and so it doesn't help the troubleshooting process, the > info is just annectodal which by itself is no use, however if others > do find similar issues it could help point the way. > > On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:14 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: > >> It's too late to post the code that fails because I already replaced it with code that works, and I'm not spending any more time on this anyways, I only posted my last message here so that if someone else sees replacefounditems failing in an unusual manner they will have a head's up as to why, or if they want to avoid getting into the same situation I did they can just avoid using replacefounditems altogether. Sincerely, Kenneth Grome www.KenGrome.com I also have used [replacefounditems] to replace several field vals at once.. never any problem. What I do when some code is not working and I simply must code around it on account of being on client's time/budget (i.e. no time to find out why the code is failing), then I just comment it out and start on my new solution.. that way later when my conscience gets the better of me, I still have that commented-out block to post here, or for my own future tinkering. -Govinda
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
> I believe that is true, without the raw printouts there is no > verification and so it doesn't help the troubleshooting process, the > info is just annectodal which by itself is no use, however if others > do find similar issues it could help point the way. > > On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:14 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: > >> It's too late to post the code that fails because I already replaced it with code that works, and I'm not spending any more time on this anyways, I only posted my last message here so that if someone else sees replacefounditems failing in an unusual manner they will have a head's up as to why, or if they want to avoid getting into the same situation I did they can just avoid using replacefounditems altogether. Sincerely, Kenneth Grome www.KenGrome.com I also have used
[replacefounditems] to replace several field vals at once.. never any problem. What I do when some code is not working and I simply must code around it on account of being on client's time/budget (i.e. no time to find out why the code is failing), then I just comment it out and start on my new solution.. that way later when my conscience gets the better of me, I still have that commented-out block to post here, or for my own future tinkering. -Govinda
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Multiple prices (1997)
Multiple cart additions (1997)
Bad URL reference? (1997)
Appending with +1 ... (1997)
Speed Optimization - Mac (1997)
RE: too many nested [xxx] (1997)
all records returned. (1997)
advise!! (2001)
Jimmy Houssen (1998)
creator code (1997)
Forms Search Questions (1997)
[OT] Who's got a cool link (2002)
empty order (2004)
emailer (1997)
Time since application launch (1999)
[SearchString] usage (1997)
emailer (1997)
BR (1997)
Emailer (1998)
Help (1999)