Re: [WebDNA] Re: Need someone to port CakePHP auction site to WebDNA

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 104682
interpreted = N
texte = I agree with Donovan.-Dan Stronghttp://www.DanStrong.comOn 2/3/2010 9:55 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote:> William DeVaul wrote:>> Perhaps a WebDNA framework should be created? The shopping site is>> probably the place to start. Lots of things to borrow from other>> frameworks.>>>> We could set up a public github and contribute/fork from there.>>>> Bill>> WSC already has a source control that is open already. ;-)>> Regarding a framework, I think the idea is perhaps putting the cart> before the horse. I think the first place to start is in purposeful> function libraries. For example, a realestate themed, or AJAX themed=20> lib.inc etc.. The goal of a framework is not that much different only=20> adding complexity with having to learn a framework API.>> I don't know that we need that complexity right now. One of the most=20> marketable things with WebDNA solutions is it's ability to affect the=20> end goal quickly (because of it's syntax and tool set). That is the=20> end goal of a framework anyway. I always want to say to my client with> the most obscure requests...> "Yes", we could do that. Though a> framework may help with some projects, once learned.. I think it can=20> also hinder the versatility that WebDNA innately has.>> Anyway, perhaps a framework is in WebDNA's future, but I don't see> it happening until we have more contributions with function libraries> and open source (or available) code to get the ball rolling.>> my .02=A2> Donovan>>>> Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

[WebDNA] Need someone to port CakePHP auction site to WebDNA (Dan Strong 2010)

I agree with Donovan.-Dan Stronghttp://www.DanStrong.comOn 2/3/2010 9:55 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote:> William DeVaul wrote:>> Perhaps a WebDNA framework should be created? The shopping site is>> probably the place to start. Lots of things to borrow from other>> frameworks.>>>> We could set up a public github and contribute/fork from there.>>>> Bill>> WSC already has a source control that is open already. ;-)>> Regarding a framework, I think the idea is perhaps putting the cart> before the horse. I think the first place to start is in purposeful> function libraries. For example, a realestate themed, or AJAX themed=20> lib.inc etc.. The goal of a framework is not that much different only=20> adding complexity with having to learn a framework API.>> I don't know that we need that complexity right now. One of the most=20> marketable things with WebDNA solutions is it's ability to affect the=20> end goal quickly (because of it's syntax and tool set). That is the=20> end goal of a framework anyway. I always want to say to my client with> the most obscure requests...> "Yes", we could do that. Though a> framework may help with some projects, once learned.. I think it can=20> also hinder the versatility that WebDNA innately has.>> Anyway, perhaps a framework is in WebDNA's future, but I don't see> it happening until we have more contributions with function libraries> and open source (or available) code to get the ball rolling.>> my .02=A2> Donovan>>>> Dan Strong

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: [WebDNA] Re: Need someone to port CakePHP auction site to WebDNA

2010

Top Articles:

Related Readings: