Re: WebCat2b14MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't hide the search string
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 10538
interpreted = N
texte = >>I thought I could hide the hyperlink search string by placing it in a>>separate file and using [include] in the hyperlink to call that string.>>Unfortunately the string still appears in the browser's Location field.>>>>How can I hide my hyperlink search strings from my users?>>You can use javascript to mask the location codes that the browser>displays. Unfortunately, this only works with Netscape 2.0+ and IE 3.0.1+.>The code would look something like this:>>
onMouseOver=self.status='Execute Search'; return true>Search for XX and>YY>>Of course, if they view the source, they can still see your search string...>>Hope this helps.Sorry, but it doesn't. I'm not interested in using Java because it's notsupported by all browsers, and unless the html source does *not* show thesearch string, what's the use of doing this anyways? Any hacker with half abrain will *always* look at the html source to see what's being hidden.But thanks for the suggestion anyways. Even though it doesn't interest me,I'm sure someone else will find it useful ... :)Sincerely,Ken------------------------------------To leave this talk list send an email to macjordomo@smithmicro.comwith BODYunsubscribe WebDNA-Talk------------------------------------
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>>I thought I could hide the hyperlink search string by placing it in a>>separate file and using
[include] in the hyperlink to call that string.>>Unfortunately the string still appears in the browser's Location field.>>>>How can I hide my hyperlink search strings from my users?>>You can use javascript to mask the location codes that the browser>displays. Unfortunately, this only works with Netscape 2.0+ and IE 3.0.1+.>The code would look something like this:>>
onMouseOver=self.status='Execute Search'; return true>Search for XX and>YY>>Of course, if they view the source, they can still see your search string...>>Hope this helps.Sorry, but it doesn't. I'm not interested in using Java because it's notsupported by all browsers, and unless the html source does *not* show thesearch string, what's the use of doing this anyways? Any hacker with half abrain will *always* look at the html source to see what's being hidden.But thanks for the suggestion anyways. Even though it doesn't interest me,I'm sure someone else will find it useful ... :)Sincerely,Ken------------------------------------To leave this
Talk List send an email to macjordomo@smithmicro.comwith BODYunsubscribe WebDNA-Talk------------------------------------
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997)
sendmail and accented characters (1998)
Instructions for Digest (1997)
Can you do this??? and other stuff (1997)
New servers and new inline cache (1997)
beta 6 on OSX wierdness | more (2000)
Credit Card not accepted (1998)
Another form question (2000)
[Sum] function? (1997)
http upload (2001)
Range Comparisons (2000)
counting characters and/or words (1997)
show all problem (1997)
WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997)
[WebDNA] unsubscribe (2008)
[foundItems] context problem (2000)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
SmithMicro FTP problems (2002)
format problem on NT? (1997)
F3 crashing server (1997)