Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 105625
interpreted = N
texte = On Jul 19, 2010, at 14:02, Kenneth Grome wrote: > Chris, one question: Why do you think your tests of v7.0 FastCGI with = your 'accelerator' are only 1/2 to 1/3 as fast as my tests using v6.2? Most probably because i use a 2.4GHz iMac, which is not a very fast = machine. Anyway, using the regular "webdna_speed" file, i get 182, which = is among the fastest. I guess you are using an even faster box. - chris Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  14. [WebDNA] CORRECTION: 60% failure rate using replace in a loop (Kenneth Grome 2010)
On Jul 19, 2010, at 14:02, Kenneth Grome wrote: > Chris, one question: Why do you think your tests of v7.0 FastCGI with = your 'accelerator' are only 1/2 to 1/3 as fast as my tests using v6.2? Most probably because i use a 2.4GHz iMac, which is not a very fast = machine. Anyway, using the regular "webdna_speed" file, i get 182, which = is among the fastest. I guess you are using an even faster box. - chris christophe.billiottet@webdna.us

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Running _every_ page through WebCat-error.html (1997) Shopping Cart Limits? (1998) [HIDEIF] inside [FOUNDITEM] (1997) [WebDNA] Problem to creat a cart (2011) 4.0x on production server (2000) Non-technical messages ... (1997) Hiding Email Addresses (2003) Carat character in path (2001) Make sure I understand this??? (1997) OT: Poll Please (2002) Robert Minor duplicate mail (1997) About WebDNA (2006) Credit card processing - UK (1997) Instructions for Digest (1997) [WebDNA] Math Precision Preshmilson (2019) Shipping Calc - done (1998) Rhapsody? (1997) WebCat2b13 Command Reference Doc error (1997) Exclamation point (1997) [NT] ie 4.0 required (1997)