Re: [WebDNA] Sending 100 mails an hour then pausing
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2010
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 105991
interpreted = N
texte = --Apple-Mail-2-510411021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I also used to use a script just like you guys are discussing here. I posted it to the list in the late 90's, if you want (old archives). But Olin's kind of advice comes up alot these days (on various lists) =20= because the tendency to end up blacklisted is so much higher these =20 days than back then. Even when you thought you followed the rules, then later you find out =20= someone blacklisted you based on such-and-such criteria. And it is of =20= course understandable how that happens... everyone is sick of spam... =20= so anti-spam efforts proliferate, despite how obtuse they can be at =20 times. I am still always at least tempted to write my own, but on this =20 topic... I have a hard time ignoring the dangers. -Govinda > I never used the services Olin suggests but he's pretty smart so I'm =20= > sure they are worth considering. > If you still want to do it the WebDNA way your proposal should =20 > work. I always fired them off one at a time but if your 100-per-=20 > batch code is working you may as well re-use it. > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > > I would recommend you use constant contact or vertical > > response. Likely you=92ll get higher delivery rates and > > you get lots of tracking to see which emails people > > click and view. --Apple-Mail-2-510411021 Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I also used to use a script = just like you guys are discussing here.
I posted it to the list in = the late 90's, if you want (old archives).
But Olin's kind of = advice comes up alot these days (on various lists) because the tendency = to end up blacklisted is so much higher these days than back = then.
Even when you thought you followed the rules, then later = you find out someone blacklisted you based on such-and-such criteria. = And it is of course understandable how that happens... = everyone is sick of spam... so anti-spam efforts proliferate, = despite how obtuse they can be at times.
I am still always at = least tempted to write my own, but on this topic... I have a hard time = ignoring the = dangers.
-Govinda
I never used the services Olin suggests but he's = pretty smart so I'm sure they are worth considering.
If you still = want to do it the WebDNA way your proposal should work. I always fired = them off one at a time but if your 100-per-batch code is working you may = as well re-use it.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Grome
> I would recommend you use = constant contact or vertical
> response. Likely you=92ll get higher = delivery rates and
> you get lots of tracking to see which emails = people
> click and = view.
= --Apple-Mail-2-510411021--
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
--Apple-Mail-2-510411021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I also used to use a script just like you guys are discussing here. I posted it to the list in the late 90's, if you want (old archives). But Olin's kind of advice comes up alot these days (on various lists) =20= because the tendency to end up blacklisted is so much higher these =20 days than back then. Even when you thought you followed the rules, then later you find out =20= someone blacklisted you based on such-and-such criteria. And it is of =20= course understandable how that happens... everyone is sick of spam... =20= so anti-spam efforts proliferate, despite how obtuse they can be at =20 times. I am still always at least tempted to write my own, but on this =20 topic... I have a hard time ignoring the dangers. -Govinda > I never used the services Olin suggests but he's pretty smart so I'm =20= > sure they are worth considering. > If you still want to do it the WebDNA way your proposal should =20 > work. I always fired them off one at a time but if your 100-per-=20 > batch code is working you may as well re-use it. > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > > I would recommend you use constant contact or vertical > > response. Likely you=92ll get higher delivery rates and > > you get lots of tracking to see which emails people > > click and view. --Apple-Mail-2-510411021 Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I also used to use a script = just like you guys are discussing here.
I posted it to the list in = the late 90's, if you want (old archives).
But Olin's kind of = advice comes up alot these days (on various lists) because the tendency = to end up blacklisted is so much higher these days than back = then.
Even when you thought you followed the rules, then later = you find out someone blacklisted you based on such-and-such criteria. = And it is of course understandable how that happens... = everyone is sick of spam... so anti-spam efforts proliferate, = despite how obtuse they can be at times.
I am still always at = least tempted to write my own, but on this topic... I have a hard time = ignoring the = dangers.
-Govinda
I never used the services Olin suggests but he's = pretty smart so I'm sure they are worth considering.
If you still = want to do it the WebDNA way your proposal should work. I always fired = them off one at a time but if your 100-per-batch code is working you may = as well re-use it.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Grome
> I would recommend you use = constant contact or vertical
> response. Likely you=92ll get higher = delivery rates and
> you get lots of tracking to see which emails = people
> click and = view.
= --Apple-Mail-2-510411021--
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Odd [math] behavior (2003)
user selectable sort order (2000)
EMailer - WebSTAR V - OSX - WebDNA (2003)
b12 cannot limit records returned and more. (1997)
View order not right (1997)
Providing hard copy of database to client (1997)
Summing fields (1997)
maximu values for sendmail! (1997)
Configuring E-mail (1997)
[WebDNA] seconds_to_time (2017)
Protect groups and delete command (2000)
Date search - yes or no (1997)
[WebDNA] feature suggestion (2011)
Help name our technology! (1997)
PCS Frames (1997)
[WebDNA] TCPConnect Help (2014)
DataBaseHelper Flawed (1997)
Pixel parameters (2000)
Multiple Ad databases? (1997)
Virtual Postcard almost complete... (1998)