[WebDNA] Re: group searching not working as expected.
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2010
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106058
interpreted = N
texte = I just checked and the behavior I describe is the same on version 7.. so my question is for the fast cgi too.*Thanks to anyone* who has a suggestion how to do this (see my last question at the bottom) using grouped fields (i.e *without* multiple searches - which I am trying to avoid, because the db is large and going to be very large later.. i.e. SLOW).-G> Hi everyone>> version=6.0> platform=unix-Linux Intel RedHat>> I hit a wall with group searching which I did not expect.> Can you guys confirm the behavior so I can move on to tackling the > problem another way? (Meanwhile I keep thinking group searching > *should* work the way I want, no?)>> imagine a db like so:>> ==================== START my.db ==============================> feeled1_Fruit
feeled2_WhereGrownfeeled3_HowUsed> 1applewashingtonbaked dessert> 2bananaecuadorbreakfast> 3cherrycaliforniabaked dessert> 4mangoindiaspecial treat> 5pineapplehawaiisweet indian curry> 6blueberrycaliforniabaked dessert> ==================== END my.db ================================>> We would think that this:> [search > db > = > my > .db > &group1field > = > feeled1_Fruit > &group2field > = > feeled1_Fruit > &eqgroup1data > =1apple&eqgroup2data=3cherry&wsfeeled3_HowUseddatarq=[URL]baked > dessert[/URL]&max=500]>> ...should return the 1st and 3rd record, correct?>> But it returns the 1st, 3rd, and 6th records.>> If you were coding this, how would you write this search so that it > finds ONLY record #1 & #3, using grouped fields?>> (I need to be able to tell the search to return records where:> -[feeled3_HowUsed] = baked dessert, *AND*> -[feeled1_Fruit] = (*either* "1apple" or "3cherry" or "4mango">> ...which is only records #1 and #3.)>> ------------> Govinda>>>>>>------------Govinda
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I just checked and the behavior I describe is the same on version 7.. so my question is for the fast cgi too.*Thanks to anyone* who has a suggestion how to do this (see my last question at the bottom) using grouped fields (i.e *without* multiple searches - which I am trying to avoid, because the db is large and going to be very large later.. i.e. SLOW).-G> Hi everyone>> version=6.0> platform=unix-Linux Intel RedHat>> I hit a wall with group searching which I did not expect.> Can you guys confirm the behavior so I can move on to tackling the > problem another way? (Meanwhile I keep thinking group searching > *should* work the way I want, no?)>> imagine a db like so:>> ==================== START my.db ==============================> feeled1_Fruitfeeled2_WhereGrownfeeled3_HowUsed> 1applewashingtonbaked dessert> 2bananaecuadorbreakfast> 3cherrycaliforniabaked dessert> 4mangoindiaspecial treat> 5pineapplehawaiisweet indian curry> 6blueberrycaliforniabaked dessert> ==================== END my.db ================================>> We would think that this:> [search > db > = > my > .db > &group1field > = > feeled1_Fruit > &group2field > = > feeled1_Fruit > &eqgroup1data > =1apple&eqgroup2data=3cherry&wsfeeled3_HowUseddatarq=[url]baked > dessert[/URL]&max=500]>> ...should return the 1st and 3rd record, correct?>> But it returns the 1st, 3rd, and 6th records.>> If you were coding this, how would you write this search so that it > finds ONLY record #1 & #3, using grouped fields?>> (I need to be able to tell the search to return records where:> -[feeled3_HowUsed] = baked dessert, *AND*> -[feeled1_Fruit] = (*either* "1apple" or "3cherry" or "4mango">> ...which is only records #1 and #3.)>> ------------> Govinda>>>>>>------------Govinda
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
For those of you not on the WebCatalog Beta... (1997)
Web Developer Product Awards (1997)
Fun with dates (1997)
NT or Mac (1997)
Ignoring [OrderFile] context (2005)
[BULK] [WebDNA] Authorize.net SIM, Server Integration Method (2011)
remotely add + sign (1997)
Assigning new CART number (1997)
[BoldWords] WebCat.acgib15Mac (1997)
WebCatalog does not have enough memory message... HELP (2001)
Problem (1997)
Frames (1997)
Cart questions (1997)
Search bug. Help (2002)
TEXT Variable (2003)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
frames & carts (1997)
listfile options (1997)
Webstar 1.3.1 PPC (1997)
Change to UPPERCASE (2000)