Re: [WebDNA] feature suggestion - long response
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2011
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106805
interpreted = N
texte = I am intrigued as I'm mostly familiar with Rails MVC. I thought the reason MVC works well in Rails is the ORM is made possible/clean by objectifying a record row. There are potential call backs in the lifecycle of an object. For example, one can perform certain actions before and after creating, modifying, saving and object. This would be a challenge in WebDNA because it is conceptually so different. What I have been trying to do is to keep MC away from the V in WebDNA. Defining more functions around the data and using those. The concept of DRYing up the code is more important (and way more achievable IMHO) than MVC. I would love to see what other people are doing? Are there other users of git as well? I am finding that it work great to track revisions Bill On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Tom Duke
wrote: > Brian, > Pretty interesting. =A0Looks a lot like the way I am trying to shape my c= ode - > without knowing about MVC methods. =A0 I'm going to check out the thinkin= g and > logic behind MVC now. > > Take care > - Tom > --------------------------------------------------------- This message is > sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscri= be, > E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug > Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I am intrigued as I'm mostly familiar with Rails MVC. I thought the reason MVC works well in Rails is the ORM is made possible/clean by objectifying a record row. There are potential call backs in the lifecycle of an object. For example, one can perform certain actions before and after creating, modifying, saving and object. This would be a challenge in WebDNA because it is conceptually so different. What I have been trying to do is to keep MC away from the V in WebDNA. Defining more functions around the data and using those. The concept of DRYing up the code is more important (and way more achievable IMHO) than MVC. I would love to see what other people are doing? Are there other users of git as well? I am finding that it work great to track revisions Bill On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Tom Duke wrote: > Brian, > Pretty interesting. =A0Looks a lot like the way I am trying to shape my c= ode - > without knowing about MVC methods. =A0 I'm going to check out the thinkin= g and > logic behind MVC now. > > Take care > - Tom > --------------------------------------------------------- This message is > sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscri= be, > E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug > Reporting: support@webdna.us
William DeVaul
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[WebDNA] A 'globals' folder on the FastCGI version? (2015)
WebDNA Speed Test (2008)
About Include (2001)
Re[2]: php vs WebCatalog (2000)
Date search - yes or no (1997)
Semi-OT SSL IE problem (2005)
WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997)
[WebDNA] Domain upgrade questions (2009)
Reversing [ipaddress] normalization (1998)
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
More Applescript (1997)
Sandboxes (2004)
Webten + Webcat running smooth (1998)
won't serve .tpl -not permissions- can't process .tpl (2000)
Document Contains No Data! (1997)
[ShowNext] (1997)
Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997)
WebCat2_Mac RETURNs in .db (1997)
Secure server question (1997)
How does WebCatalog search the database? (1997)