[WebDNA] i wish we could require one *amongst of a collection* of search comparisons/params

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 107295
interpreted = N
texte = I need to find records that belong to a client (in a db full of records = for lots of clients), *AND* where a user-input string is found in one of = several other fields. So... I wish i had a good quick way (without loading a big RAM [table] (which = crash webdna when they get too large)) to effectively do this: imaginary (sample) syntax: [Search = db=3Dqqqqqq.db&eqTHIS_FIELDxxx_REQUIREDdatarq=3D[aaa]&eqFIELDyyydatarq1of2= =3D[bbb]&eqFIELDzzzdatarq2of2=3D[bbb]] [!]--- would return records where: 1.) [THIS_FIELDxxx_REQUIRED] *necessarily = contained* "[aaa]" *AND*=20 2.) *ANY* (*but at least one*) of these = conditions were met: 2a.) [FIELDyyy] contained "[bbb]" *OR* 2b.) [FIELDzzz] contained "[bbb]" ---[/!] [/Search] Given version 6.02, How would you do this (without a [table])? Thanks -Govinda= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] i wish we could require one *amongst of a collection* of search comparisons/params (aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com 2011)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] i wish we could require one *amongst of a collection* of search comparisons/params (Govinda 2011)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] i wish we could require one *amongst of a collection* of search comparisons/params (aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com 2011)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] i wish we could require one *amongst of a collection* of search comparisons/params (Govinda 2011)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] i wish we could require one *amongst of a collection* of search comparisons/params (aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com 2011)
  6. [WebDNA] i wish we could require one *amongst of a collection* of search comparisons/params (Govinda 2011)
I need to find records that belong to a client (in a db full of records = for lots of clients), *AND* where a user-input string is found in one of = several other fields. So... I wish i had a good quick way (without loading a big RAM [table] (which = crash webdna when they get too large)) to effectively do this: imaginary (sample) syntax: [Search = db=3Dqqqqqq.db&eqTHIS_FIELDxxx_REQUIREDdatarq=3D[aaa]&eqFIELDyyydatarq1of2= =3D[bbb]&eqFIELDzzzdatarq2of2=3D[bbb]] [!]--- would return records where: 1.) [THIS_FIELDxxx_REQUIRED] *necessarily = contained* "[aaa]" *AND*=20 2.) *ANY* (*but at least one*) of these = conditions were met: 2a.) [FIELDyyy] contained "[bbb]" *OR* 2b.) [FIELDzzz] contained "[bbb]" ---[/!] [/Search] Given version 6.02, How would you do this (without a [table])? Thanks -Govinda= Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

How can I Add several Items into the cart at once? (1997) Hosting Service (1998) random sorting broken (was Re[2]: php vs WebCatalog) (2000) Help with nested search (1998) WebCatalog and Bar Code Scanners (1999) FW: WebDNA-Talk searchable? (1997) Summ=T Problem (1997) Forms & Tables (1998) Preventing code execution (2003) [WebDNA] Foreign characters (2009) (2009) Showing unopened cart (1997) 'does not contain' operator needed ... (1997) Faxing orders in place of email (1997) Bug? (1997) Fedora Core 6 (2007) problems with 2 tags shakur (1997) Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997) problems with WebCat-Plugin (1997) Email Formatting (1998) Major Security Hole IIS NT (1998)