Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 107731
interpreted = N
texte = I am not sure this will change anything, except if WebDNA or the = configuration became corrupted. The problem is certainly related to = code. WebDNA 7.0 allows to isolate the problematic website in an easier = way, and fixing it would just require to shut down the faulty site and = isolate the code. Did you check the RAM usage? when too many databases = are opened, WebDNA will close some of them to free space for others. - chris On Nov 25, 2011, at 16:46, William DeVaul wrote: > I do not know about the reinstall. I'd imagine that could be > complicated and is best done off line or expecting some down time. >=20 > Bill >=20 > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Thierry Almy wrote: >> We notice lots more traffic from search engines on the sites we just = moved >> to another server within the same subnet, having done just minor = changes to >> the sites. >> I don't understand it ... >> On our old G5 box, we host about 100 sites, most with WebDNA, and the >> processor is between 2% and 25%, maybe for a very short time over = 50%. >> We moved a few complicated sites to the new server and there it goes = up to >> 185% and stays there! >> I believe we have an error somewhere, maybe the module? >> Is it safe to just reinstall WebDNA over the existing installation? >> Thierry >>=20 >> That's what I'm seeing, the file gets big fast. I'm getting more = than >> 1600 requests per hour. Mostly search engines at work. I'm guessing >> that my move about 6 months ago to make those pages more dynamic and >> less static has hurt performance. >>=20 >> Not sure I see a clear problem except going from static to dynamic = and >> even that is a maybe. >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This = message is >> sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To = unsubscribe, >> E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug >> Reporting: support@webdna.us > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing - conclusion (Kenneth Grome 2011)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing - conclusion (Thierry Almy 2011)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Kenneth Grome 2011)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Thierry Almy 2011)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Kenneth Grome 2011)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Thierry Almy 2011)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Kenneth Grome 2011)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Thierry Almy 2011)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Kenneth Grome 2011)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (William DeVaul 2011)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (William DeVaul 2011)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (William DeVaul 2011)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (William DeVaul 2011)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Kenneth Grome 2011)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Donovan Brooke 2011)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing ("Mr. Robert Minor Jr." 2011)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Donovan Brooke 2011)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2011)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (William DeVaul 2011)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (William DeVaul 2011)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2011)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing ("lists@almy.ch" 2011)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2011)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (William DeVaul 2011)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Thierry Almy 2011)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (William DeVaul 2011)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (William DeVaul 2011)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Thierry Almy 2011)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Donovan Brooke 2011)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Donovan Brooke 2011)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Thierry Almy 2011)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (William DeVaul 2011)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Thierry Almy 2011)
  34. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Thierry Almy 2011)
  35. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Daniel Meola 2011)
  36. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (D Brooke 2011)
  37. [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing (Thierry Almy 2011)
I am not sure this will change anything, except if WebDNA or the = configuration became corrupted. The problem is certainly related to = code. WebDNA 7.0 allows to isolate the problematic website in an easier = way, and fixing it would just require to shut down the faulty site and = isolate the code. Did you check the RAM usage? when too many databases = are opened, WebDNA will close some of them to free space for others. - chris On Nov 25, 2011, at 16:46, William DeVaul wrote: > I do not know about the reinstall. I'd imagine that could be > complicated and is best done off line or expecting some down time. >=20 > Bill >=20 > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Thierry Almy wrote: >> We notice lots more traffic from search engines on the sites we just = moved >> to another server within the same subnet, having done just minor = changes to >> the sites. >> I don't understand it ... >> On our old G5 box, we host about 100 sites, most with WebDNA, and the >> processor is between 2% and 25%, maybe for a very short time over = 50%. >> We moved a few complicated sites to the new server and there it goes = up to >> 185% and stays there! >> I believe we have an error somewhere, maybe the module? >> Is it safe to just reinstall WebDNA over the existing installation? >> Thierry >>=20 >> That's what I'm seeing, the file gets big fast. I'm getting more = than >> 1600 requests per hour. Mostly search engines at work. I'm guessing >> that my move about 6 months ago to make those pages more dynamic and >> less static has hurt performance. >>=20 >> Not sure I see a clear problem except going from static to dynamic = and >> even that is a maybe. >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This = message is >> sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To = unsubscribe, >> E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug >> Reporting: support@webdna.us > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us christophe.billiottet@webdna.us

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

How do I get multiple unique numbers on one template? (2000) Need help (1998) Two submit buttons ? (1997) WC2b12: Yes, Formulas.db is for real (1997) apparently to problem isolated (1997) How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? (2004) Archives... (1997) Signal Raised error (1997) Wanted: More Math Functions (or, Can You Solve This?) (1997) Re:HTTP header line is too long? (1997) Another Large Database Questions (1997) WebDNA - Commerce Edition.debug (2005) Nested tags count question (1997) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) Saving Text Areas with Orders (1997) Re:PCS Customer submissions ? (1997) [append] vs. [appendfile] delta + question? (1997) database size? (1997) Forms Search Questions (1997)