Re: [WebDNA] Re: table comma field delimiter bug?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108103
interpreted = N
texte = Chris, Please keep the "," feature in databases. Deprecate the comma delimiter in tables. Matt On 1/13/2012 4:48 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Hi everybody! interesting thread. I just did some tests myself and also= found that commas were interpreted as field delimiters in tables. I do n= ot think it is a bug, but it is an inconsistency. > > http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D214 > > Here an ex: > > "PCS","11770, Bernardo Plaza Court","San Diego","CA","92128" > > At this time the comma in the street field is interpreted as delimiter.= It clearly should not. > > Since my plans are to =91normalize=92 inconsistencies in current WebDNA= language in the next versions, i have a listing of all notes and request= s found on this talk-list during the last 3 years. > > In this case, and in order to keep [table] and database format on par > - should we deprecate the comma field delimiters in tables? > - should we deprecate the comma field delimiters in databases and table= s? > - should we enforce the comma field delimiters in databases and tables = by using "," (a comma surrounded by two quotation marks)? in this case, t= he quotation mark would become an essential part of the database/table fo= rmat, and the lack of a single quotation mark would "break" the database = format. > > > > - chris > > > > > On Jan 13, 2012, at 5:34, Tom Duke wrote: > >> Ken, >> >> Hi - I have experienced the same issues as yourself. The discussion = at the time clarified that commas were interpreted as field delimiters wi= thin tables and could not be used. >> >> The simplest way to deal with this is to set up your table but then ad= d data using [append] and [url]'ing the values. >> >> - Tom >> --------------------------------------------------------- This message= is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsub= scribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bu= g Reporting: support@webdna.us > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > > > > --=20 > Matthew A Perosi > Corporate Consultant > Mobile Marketing Expert > Senior Web Developer > SEO Analyst& Educator > > Psi Prime, Inc. > 323 Union Blvd. > Totowa, NJ 07512 > > Service: 973.413.8211 > Training: 973.413.8214 > Fax: 973.413.8217 > > http://www.perosi.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Kenneth Grome 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Govinda 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Kenneth Grome 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  8. [WebDNA] table comma field delimiter bug? (Kenneth Grome 2012)
Chris, Please keep the "," feature in databases. Deprecate the comma delimiter in tables. Matt On 1/13/2012 4:48 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Hi everybody! interesting thread. I just did some tests myself and also= found that commas were interpreted as field delimiters in tables. I do n= ot think it is a bug, but it is an inconsistency. > > http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D214 > > Here an ex: > > "PCS","11770, Bernardo Plaza Court","San Diego","CA","92128" > > At this time the comma in the street field is interpreted as delimiter.= It clearly should not. > > Since my plans are to =91normalize=92 inconsistencies in current WebDNA= language in the next versions, i have a listing of all notes and request= s found on this talk-list during the last 3 years. > > In this case, and in order to keep [table] and Database format on par > - should we deprecate the comma field delimiters in tables? > - should we deprecate the comma field delimiters in databases and table= s? > - should we enforce the comma field delimiters in databases and tables = by using "," (a comma surrounded by two quotation marks)? in this case, t= he quotation mark would become an essential part of the database/table fo= rmat, and the lack of a single quotation mark would "break" the database = format. > > > > - chris > > > > > On Jan 13, 2012, at 5:34, Tom Duke wrote: > >> Ken, >> >> Hi - I have experienced the same issues as yourself. The discussion = at the time clarified that commas were interpreted as field delimiters wi= thin tables and could not be used. >> >> The simplest way to deal with this is to set up your table but then ad= d data using [append] and [url]'ing the values. >> >> - Tom >> --------------------------------------------------------- This message= is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsub= scribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bu= g Reporting: support@webdna.us > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > > > > --=20 > Matthew A Perosi > Corporate Consultant > Mobile Marketing Expert > Senior Web Developer > SEO Analyst& Educator > > Psi Prime, Inc. > 323 Union Blvd. > Totowa, NJ 07512 > > Service: 973.413.8211 > Training: 973.413.8214 > Fax: 973.413.8217 > > http://www.perosi.com "Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi "

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

database visibility (2000) PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997) NT or Mac (1997) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) Include a big block of text (1997) WebCat b13 CGI -shownext- (1997) Search/sort in URL Was: GuestBook example (1997) Couple of questions (1999) Help name our technology! (1997) about this server and links to who (1997) NetForms for mail, sorry (1998) Plugin or CGI or both (1997) Protect Tag and Groups (1998) PIXO support (1997) database files in secure folder (1997) Postprocessing CCs (2000) Listfiles (1998) Shownext and Jumping between pages (2000) Am I going senile? (Price recalc based on quantity) (1997) date format (2000)