Re: [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108912
interpreted = N
texte = This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060808060803020906040200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If you want to resize images on the fly for mobile, tablets and full size for browsers, how about using Sencha http://www.sencha.com/learn/how-to-use-src-sencha-io/ All you need to do is prepend your absolute path images with http://src.sencha.io/ Govinda wrote: > On 2012-03-28, at 11:55 AM, Tom Duke wrote: > >> Govinda, >> >> Hi - I hear you. Though if you follow the principles of 'Mobile First Responsive Design' - which is how we plan to head - then you need to do some server side magic to ensure that mobile users don't get hit with the full download required for desktop users. > > Right. > You are ahead of me here. > > Note, FWIW: I did notice somewhere on the MS/IE site (while in a hurry about something else) that (IIRC) IE10 (IE9 already?) will/does support I forget what technology (JS-based?) mechanism to serve ONLY the right files/images *according to the media queries*. Maybe that will catch on and get rolled into the other browsers soon enough? Anyway it is worth noting, and also pleasant to imagine that things go the way of "save the devs from even more headache/complication". > > On that last, more personal/human note, I also enjoy watching the handhelds slowly gain ground to match the specs we enjoy on desktop (to whatever extent). I try to balance 'everything that would be perfectly done technically, today', - with - 'what I actually enjoy doing, today'. > In the end (and even now, for me anyway) it is the joy balance (and it's benefit, or toll) that is going to register most. If we wait exactly 2 weeks, we are going to have to redo the works to get it PERFECT again. > > -G > >> Still not sure yet how we'll get it to work - maybe use background images defined in CSS - so we load up the correct size based on the media query rule. >> >> Donovan - hi yea I'm aware of Terry's great library - I'm thinking the imagemagick bit shouldn't be too complicated - it's the mod-rewrite bits and the http headers (particularly as WebDNA 6.2 on CentOS doesn't let you define the content-type headers) that I can see being awkward. >> >> - Tom > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --------------060808060803020906040200 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If you want to resize images on the fly for mobile, tablets and full size for browsers, how about using Sencha

http://www.sencha.com/learn/how-to-use-src-sencha-io/

All you need to do is prepend your absolute path images with http://src.sencha.io/


Govinda wrote: 
On 2012-03-28, at 11:55 AM, Tom Duke wrote:
Govinda,Hi - I hear you.  Though if you follow the principles of 'Mobile First Responsive Design'  - which is how we plan to head - then you need to do some server side magic to ensure that mobile users don't get hit with the full download required for desktop users.
Right.You are ahead of me here.Note, FWIW: I did notice somewhere on the MS/IE site (while in a hurry about something else)  that (IIRC) IE10 (IE9 already?)  will/does support I forget what technology (JS-based?) mechanism to serve ONLY the right files/images *according to the media queries*.  Maybe that will catch on and get rolled into the other browsers soon enough?  Anyway it is worth noting, and also pleasant to imagine that things go the way of "save the devs from even more headache/complication".  On that last, more personal/human note, I also enjoy watching the handhelds slowly gain ground to match the specs we enjoy on desktop (to whatever extent).  I try to balance 'everything that would be perfectly done technically, today',   - with -    'what I actually enjoy doing, today'.  In the end (and even now, for me anyway) it is the joy balance (and it's benefit, or toll) that is going to register most.  If we wait exactly 2 weeks, we are going to have to redo the works to get it PERFECT again.-G
Still not sure yet how we'll get it to work - maybe use background images defined in CSS - so we load up the correct size based on the media query rule.Donovan - hi yea I'm aware of Terry's great library - I'm thinking the imagemagick bit shouldn't be too complicated - it's the mod-rewrite bits and the http headers (particularly as WebDNA 6.2 on CentOS doesn't let you define the content-type headers) that I can see being awkward.- Tom
---------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing list <talk@webdna.us>.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <talk-leave@webdna.us>archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.usBug Reporting: support@webdna.us
--------------060808060803020906040200-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly (Govinda 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly (Olin Lagon 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly (Govinda 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly (Daniel Meola 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly (Tom Duke 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly (Govinda 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly (Donovan Brooke 2012)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly (Tom Duke 2012)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly (Govinda 2012)
  11. [WebDNA] Image resizing on the fly (Tom Duke 2012)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060808060803020906040200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If you want to resize images on the fly for mobile, tablets and full size for browsers, how about using Sencha http://www.sencha.com/learn/how-to-use-src-sencha-io/ All you need to do is prepend your absolute path images with http://src.sencha.io/ Govinda wrote: > On 2012-03-28, at 11:55 AM, Tom Duke wrote: > >> Govinda, >> >> Hi - I hear you. Though if you follow the principles of 'Mobile First Responsive Design' - which is how we plan to head - then you need to do some server side magic to ensure that mobile users don't get hit with the full download required for desktop users. > > Right. > You are ahead of me here. > > Note, FWIW: I did notice somewhere on the MS/IE site (while in a hurry about something else) that (IIRC) IE10 (IE9 already?) will/does support I forget what technology (JS-based?) mechanism to serve ONLY the right files/images *according to the media queries*. Maybe that will catch on and get rolled into the other browsers soon enough? Anyway it is worth noting, and also pleasant to imagine that things go the way of "save the devs from even more headache/complication". > > On that last, more personal/human note, I also enjoy watching the handhelds slowly gain ground to match the specs we enjoy on desktop (to whatever extent). I try to balance 'everything that would be perfectly done technically, today', - with - 'what I actually enjoy doing, today'. > In the end (and even now, for me anyway) it is the joy balance (and it's benefit, or toll) that is going to register most. If we wait exactly 2 weeks, we are going to have to redo the works to get it PERFECT again. > > -G > >> Still not sure yet how we'll get it to work - maybe use background images defined in CSS - so we load up the correct size based on the media query rule. >> >> Donovan - hi yea I'm aware of Terry's great library - I'm thinking the imagemagick bit shouldn't be too complicated - it's the mod-rewrite bits and the http headers (particularly as WebDNA 6.2 on CentOS doesn't let you define the content-type headers) that I can see being awkward. >> >> - Tom > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --------------060808060803020906040200 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If you want to resize images on the fly for mobile, tablets and full size for browsers, how about using Sencha

http://www.sencha.com/learn/how-to-use-src-sencha-io/

All you need to do is prepend your absolute path images with http://src.sencha.io/


Govinda wrote: 
On 2012-03-28, at 11:55 AM, Tom Duke wrote:
Govinda,Hi - I hear you.  Though if you follow the principles of 'Mobile First Responsive Design'  - which is how we plan to head - then you need to do some server side magic to ensure that mobile users don't get hit with the full download required for desktop users.
Right.You are ahead of me here.Note, FWIW: I did notice somewhere on the MS/IE site (while in a hurry about something else)  that (IIRC) IE10 (IE9 already?)  will/does support I forget what technology (JS-based?) mechanism to serve ONLY the right files/images *according to the media queries*.  Maybe that will catch on and get rolled into the other browsers soon enough?  Anyway it is worth noting, and also pleasant to imagine that things go the way of "save the devs from even more headache/complication".  On that last, more personal/human note, I also enjoy watching the handhelds slowly gain ground to match the specs we enjoy on desktop (to whatever extent).  I try to balance 'everything that would be perfectly done technically, today',   - with -    'what I actually enjoy doing, today'.  In the end (and even now, for me anyway) it is the joy balance (and it's benefit, or toll) that is going to register most.  If we wait exactly 2 weeks, we are going to have to redo the works to get it PERFECT again.-G
Still not sure yet how we'll get it to work - maybe use background images defined in CSS - so we load up the correct size based on the media query rule.Donovan - hi yea I'm aware of Terry's great library - I'm thinking the imagemagick bit shouldn't be too complicated - it's the mod-rewrite bits and the http headers (particularly as WebDNA 6.2 on CentOS doesn't let you define the content-type headers) that I can see being awkward.- Tom
---------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing list <talk@webdna.us>.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <talk-leave@webdna.us>archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.usBug Reporting: support@webdna.us
--------------060808060803020906040200-- Olin Lagon

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Credit Card Number checking (1997) Secure Sever and showcart errors (1997) [addlineitems] (1997) EMailFolder (2007) Re:PCS Customer submissions ? (1997) Protect vs Authenicate (1997) limiting found items (2001) OT: Several requests (2003) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) RE: Renaming textA (1998) Cart questions (1997) check out page (SSL) *still* not loading on Netscape 4.0+ (1999) WebCAT has the devil in it! (2003) Problem with a search context (2005) OK, here goes... (1997) Interpret twice? (1997) off topic - dna snipets (1997) Freeze (2003) Opinion: [input] should be called [output] ... (1997) Security Issues and WebCommerce Solution (1997)