Re: [WebDNA] Linux Support

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2013


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110192
interpreted = N
texte = Hi Kenneth, Not offended in any way, but being a part of and understanding market = economy I need to emphasize that there is always to sides of everything, = in this case a company and a customer. I have the right amount of = respect for Donovan and Christophe for trying to rescue what Smith Micro = put into the grave. I for one have chosen the Mac platform and have = invested a lot of money in the product WebDNA and a huge amount of hours = in developing services - and I cant escape the thought of being left = behind no matter how hard the current team are working (as mentioned = before, with all respect). I accept their decision in a market = perspective but I as a loyal customer is left behind. That's all - no = pun intended... It would help, just a tad, if a well written roadmap where published in = public with focus on platforms and functionality - what I have seen = today has been very scattered. And would (as always) be happy to help in = many ways, but I think additional licenses is on hold until I can = actually see that I get something for the money on the platform of my = choice. Long live WebDNA and may the platform also be attractive for me in the = future... /Palle On 26/02/2013, at 18.45, Kenneth Grome wrote: > No offense to you or any other Mac server users, but when a=20 > company like WSC has "only so much" money to work with it=20 > becomes critically important that they apply those limited=20 > funds where they will generate maximum revenue ASAP. >=20 > After WSC is making money hand over fist on their future=20 > Linux software sales they can easily use some of that excess=20 > cash to splurge on developing software for less popular=20 > server OS's -- such as OSX and Windows for example. Until=20 > then I believe they are doing exactly what they need to do. >=20 > I used to be a die-hard Mac guy, too. Do many/any of you=20 > remember that far back? We're talking the mid/late 1990's! >=20 > :) >=20 > If I were still a dedicated Mac fanatic like I was back=20 > then, I might feel slighted by WSC's decision to put off the=20 > OSX version until later. Nevertheless this is a very wise=20 > business decision for WSC and I applaud them for it. >=20 > WSC's first priority should always be to focus on the=20 > software that sells in their largest potential market. In=20 > this day and age that market runs Linux servers. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >> You almost answered my question here... >>=20 >> Seems like we are now second priority. >>=20 >> /Palle >>=20 >> On 26/02/2013, at 17.30, Donovan Brooke=20 > wrote: >>> I should note that WSC will be holding off on a new >>> WebDNA Server build for the latest Mac OS X OS, simply >>> because WebDNA 6.2 still runs fine on it. OS X will >>> still be supported, but a new WebDNA Server build will >>> be down the road a bit. > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Linux Support (Palle Bo Nielsen 2013)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Linux Support (Kenneth Grome 2013)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Linux Support (Palle Bo Nielsen 2013)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Linux Support (Kenneth Grome 2013)
  5. [WebDNA] Linux Support (Donovan Brooke 2013)
Hi Kenneth, Not offended in any way, but being a part of and understanding market = economy I need to emphasize that there is always to sides of everything, = in this case a company and a customer. I have the right amount of = respect for Donovan and Christophe for trying to rescue what Smith Micro = put into the grave. I for one have chosen the Mac platform and have = invested a lot of money in the product WebDNA and a huge amount of hours = in developing services - and I cant escape the thought of being left = behind no matter how hard the current team are working (as mentioned = before, with all respect). I accept their decision in a market = perspective but I as a loyal customer is left behind. That's all - no = pun intended... It would help, just a tad, if a well written roadmap where published in = public with focus on platforms and functionality - what I have seen = today has been very scattered. And would (as always) be happy to help in = many ways, but I think additional licenses is on hold until I can = actually see that I get something for the money on the platform of my = choice. Long live WebDNA and may the platform also be attractive for me in the = future... /Palle On 26/02/2013, at 18.45, Kenneth Grome wrote: > No offense to you or any other Mac server users, but when a=20 > company like WSC has "only so much" money to work with it=20 > becomes critically important that they apply those limited=20 > funds where they will generate maximum revenue ASAP. >=20 > After WSC is making money hand over fist on their future=20 > Linux software sales they can easily use some of that excess=20 > cash to splurge on developing software for less popular=20 > server OS's -- such as OSX and Windows for example. Until=20 > then I believe they are doing exactly what they need to do. >=20 > I used to be a die-hard Mac guy, too. Do many/any of you=20 > remember that far back? We're talking the mid/late 1990's! >=20 > :) >=20 > If I were still a dedicated Mac fanatic like I was back=20 > then, I might feel slighted by WSC's decision to put off the=20 > OSX version until later. Nevertheless this is a very wise=20 > business decision for WSC and I applaud them for it. >=20 > WSC's first priority should always be to focus on the=20 > software that sells in their largest potential market. In=20 > this day and age that market runs Linux servers. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >> You almost answered my question here... >>=20 >> Seems like we are now second priority. >>=20 >> /Palle >>=20 >> On 26/02/2013, at 17.30, Donovan Brooke=20 > wrote: >>> I should note that WSC will be holding off on a new >>> WebDNA Server build for the latest Mac OS X OS, simply >>> because WebDNA 6.2 still runs fine on it. OS X will >>> still be supported, but a new WebDNA Server build will >>> be down the road a bit. > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Palle Bo Nielsen

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Sendmail question (2005) 2.0 Info (1997) XML Syntax, Cookies and Variables.... (2004) How to Sort Summ data ? (1997) SMSI gift cert. module (2003) en/decrypt problem (1999) Signal Raised (1997) ConvertCharacters (2000) 2.0 Info (1997) Cookies and webcat (1997) Problems with [Applescript] (1997) WebDNA (WebCatalog) working with iTools 7.3 (2004) Searching multiple fields (1997) Location of Webcat site in folder hierarchy (1997) OK, here goes... (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) Where is Orders.db appended? (2000) Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997) Listserver problem (1997) Word Breaks (1998)