Re: [WebDNA] Is WebDNA slowing things up - please try these URL's
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2013
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110284
interpreted = N
texte = Christophe, It's all about the user experience and you hit the nail with this = statement... "... starts to load earlier with static and later with dynamic and it = makes the WebDNA page subjectively slower..." The early start makes the user experience much better regardless of the = the two finishing at the same time. The first impression is king - which = makes WebDNA Second Place in this measurement. /Palle On 26/03/2013, at 11.52, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > If you check the webpage tests links i added, you will see very little = difference. However when apache serves statics files at disk speed, = WebDNA servers dynamic pages at RAM speed. This means that once the = "First Byte" has been delivered, WebDNA is faster than apache serving = static files, depending only on the processing power requested by your = code. In your test, the page is completely loaded in about the same = time, but it starts to load earlier with static and later with dynamic = and it makes the WebDNA page subjectively slower. Test it with objective = tools, as i did: the difference is negligible. >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Mar 26, 2013, at 13:23, Palle Bo Nielsen
= wrote: >=20 >> But Christphe, >>=20 >> There is not a difference of 0.05 seconds as you state. The = difference is more like 0.5 sec on the repeated view. >>=20 >> /Palle >>=20 >>=20 >> On 26/03/2013, at 09.09, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >>=20 >>> A is sent from apache to webdna which returns to apache after = interpretation. B is static and served from the disc, then cached. B = might be faster than A by 0.05 second. This is normal, dynamic webpages = will usually take slightly longer to deliver the "First Byte". >>>=20 >>> http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_RM_AZ1/ >>> http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_QA_AYZ/ >>>=20 >>> - chris >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 21:41, Palle Bo Nielsen = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Looking for some feedback here... >>>>=20 >>>> Spec: Mac OS X 10.8.3 Mountain Lion Server. Using Server App and = WebDNA FastCGI 7.x (Latest). >>>>=20 >>>> I made two websites just to test what I think is too different = behavior. >>>>=20 >>>> Please try the following websites: >>>>=20 >>>> (A) http://1.qt.dk/ >>>>=20 >>>> (B) http://2.qt.dk/ >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> (A) has included in the code where as (B) = does not. >>>>=20 >>>> (A) is getting interpreted by WebDNA as expected (B) is not as = expected. >>>>=20 >>>> (A) has .dna whereas (B) has .html. If (B) got .dna then it would = be just a responsive as (A), which is not prefered. >>>>=20 >>>> So, why is (A) so much slower then (B)?? It seems like (when = looking at the progress bar in the browser, that it needs to think (or = wait) for something in scenario (A). >>>>=20 >>>> Any thoughts? >>>>=20 >>>> /Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>> the mailing list . >>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >>>=20 >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Christophe, It's all about the user experience and you hit the nail with this = statement... "... starts to load earlier with static and later with dynamic and it = makes the WebDNA page subjectively slower..." The early start makes the user experience much better regardless of the = the two finishing at the same time. The first impression is king - which = makes WebDNA Second Place in this measurement. /Palle On 26/03/2013, at 11.52, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > If you check the webpage tests links i added, you will see very little = difference. However when apache serves statics files at disk speed, = WebDNA servers dynamic pages at RAM speed. This means that once the = "First Byte" has been delivered, WebDNA is faster than apache serving = static files, depending only on the processing power requested by your = code. In your test, the page is completely loaded in about the same = time, but it starts to load earlier with static and later with dynamic = and it makes the WebDNA page subjectively slower. Test it with objective = tools, as i did: the difference is negligible. >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Mar 26, 2013, at 13:23, Palle Bo Nielsen = wrote: >=20 >> But Christphe, >>=20 >> There is not a difference of 0.05 seconds as you state. The = difference is more like 0.5 sec on the repeated view. >>=20 >> /Palle >>=20 >>=20 >> On 26/03/2013, at 09.09, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >>=20 >>> A is sent from apache to webdna which returns to apache after = interpretation. B is static and served from the disc, then cached. B = might be faster than A by 0.05 second. This is normal, dynamic webpages = will usually take slightly longer to deliver the "First Byte". >>>=20 >>> http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_RM_AZ1/ >>> http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130326_QA_AYZ/ >>>=20 >>> - chris >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 21:41, Palle Bo Nielsen = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Looking for some feedback here... >>>>=20 >>>> Spec: Mac OS X 10.8.3 Mountain Lion Server. Using Server App and = WebDNA FastCGI 7.x (Latest). >>>>=20 >>>> I made two websites just to test what I think is too different = behavior. >>>>=20 >>>> Please try the following websites: >>>>=20 >>>> (A) http://1.qt.dk/ >>>>=20 >>>> (B) http://2.qt.dk/ >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> (A) has included in the code where as (B) = does not. >>>>=20 >>>> (A) is getting interpreted by WebDNA as expected (B) is not as = expected. >>>>=20 >>>> (A) has .dna whereas (B) has .html. If (B) got .dna then it would = be just a responsive as (A), which is not prefered. >>>>=20 >>>> So, why is (A) so much slower then (B)?? It seems like (when = looking at the progress bar in the browser, that it needs to think (or = wait) for something in scenario (A). >>>>=20 >>>> Any thoughts? >>>>=20 >>>> /Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>> the mailing list . >>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >>>=20 >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Palle Bo Nielsen
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Credit card payment processor (2004)
WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996)
TeaRoom Order fields email account remain empty even though thewy are filled. (1997)
[WebDNA] Generating Excel File Via WebDNA (2010)
Sticky .inc file! (2008)
protect tag not working (1998)
Help Please WebDNA 6 Secure Forms Problem (2004)
Hyperboard (1999)
Calculating multiple shipping... (1997)
A little syntax help (1997)
[WebDNA] behavior of [thisurl] in the context of 'mod_rewrite' (2012)
Need relative path explanation (1997)
authenticating a second user (1997)
total number of matches (1999)
Not really WebCat (1997)
page redirect in webDNA (1997)
Looking up two prices in database? (1997)
New Guestbook Source (1997)
numeric sorting (2000)
Thanks for Encrypt.tpl - A Question (1999)