[WebDNA] Advanced search 'rq' problem

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2013


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110500
interpreted = N
texte = --047d7b6dc92abeaf3204e18eb7bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, Trying to build a fairly complex search form for a client. I am trying to allow the client determine whether a particular search criteria is required on a field by field basis. Is there a parameter similar to 'comp' that I can use to set the required status for a field. Something like: &FIELDNAMErq=T So in the form code I could have: Thanks - Tom --047d7b6dc92abeaf3204e18eb7bc Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

Trying to build a fairly complex search form for a client. =C2=A0 I am tr= ying to allow the client determine whether a particular search criteria is = required on a field by field basis.

Is there a parameter similar to 'comp' that I c= an use to set the required status for a field. =C2=A0Something like:
<= div>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0&FIELDNAMErq=3DT

<= /div>
So in the form code I could have:

=C2=A0 <label><input type=3D"checkbox&quo= t; name=3D"FIELDNAMErq" value=3D"T" /> required</= label>


Thanks
- Tom


--047d7b6dc92abeaf3204e18eb7bc-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Advanced search 'rq' problem (Alex McCombie 2013)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Advanced search 'rq' problem (WebDNA 2013)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Advanced search 'rq' problem (John Butler 2013)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Advanced search 'rq' problem (Tom Duke 2013)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Advanced search 'rq' problem (WebDNA 2013)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Advanced search 'rq' problem (Tom Duke 2013)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Advanced search 'rq' problem (John Butler 2013)
  8. [WebDNA] Advanced search 'rq' problem (Tom Duke 2013)
--047d7b6dc92abeaf3204e18eb7bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, Trying to build a fairly complex search form for a client. I am trying to allow the client determine whether a particular search criteria is required on a field by field basis. Is there a parameter similar to 'comp' that I can use to set the required status for a field. Something like: &FIELDNAMErq=T So in the form code I could have: Thanks - Tom --047d7b6dc92abeaf3204e18eb7bc Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

Trying to build a fairly complex search form for a client. =C2=A0 I am tr= ying to allow the client determine whether a particular search criteria is = required on a field by field basis.

Is there a parameter similar to 'comp' that I c= an use to set the required status for a field. =C2=A0Something like:
<= div>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0&FIELDNAMErq=3DT

<= /div>
So in the form code I could have:

=C2=A0 <label><input type=3D"checkbox&quo= t; name=3D"FIELDNAMErq" value=3D"T" /> required</= label>


Thanks
- Tom


--047d7b6dc92abeaf3204e18eb7bc-- Tom Duke

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

RE: IIS 4 (1998) Submitting ampersands in forms... (1998) Is this possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes (1997) [shownext] (1998) Whats going on with my SERIAL NUMBER??? (1998) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - syntax to convert date (1997) no global [username] or [password] displayed ... (1997) Showif for mulitple variations (1997) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) Time Remaining? (1998) [searchString] (1997) XMLparse odd behaviour (2004) math on date? (1997) searchable list archive (1997) Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997) WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - LONG - (1997) CERT Advisory on malicious scripts (2000) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) New to WebCat, Help. (1998) WebCat2b12 CGI Mac - [shownext] problem (1997)