Re: Nested tags count question

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 11129
interpreted = N
texte = >>Grant, you mentioned that more memory helps with the number of simultaneous >>threads with the plugin ... How much more memory? Do you have any numbers >>or percentages we might use as guidelines to make sure we don't cheat >>WebCat out of any potential speed? > >WebSTAR has guidelines for plugins vs RAM. In general it's too complex for >me to come up with some kind of formula. I think you should make sure you >have about 12 bytes per record available for each threaded plugin >instance. Never mind, it's just too complex to predict. Just give >WebSTAR lots of RAM and watch its 'high-water' marker to see what's needed.If you're referring to that cute little green block in the WebSTAR status window, I don't see that anymore because I went back to 1.3.2 - after I ran into the problem of too few nested tags with the WebCat plugin. Do you have any ideas for checking the 'high-water' level with WebSTAR 1.3.2?Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  2. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  3. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  4. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  5. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  6. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  7. Re: Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
  8. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  9. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  10. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  11. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  12. Re: Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
  13. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  14. Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
>>Grant, you mentioned that more memory helps with the number of simultaneous >>threads with the plugin ... How much more memory? Do you have any numbers >>or percentages we might use as guidelines to make sure we don't cheat >>WebCat out of any potential speed? > >WebSTAR has guidelines for plugins vs RAM. In general it's too complex for >me to come up with some kind of formula. I think you should make sure you >have about 12 bytes per record available for each threaded plugin >instance. Never mind, it's just too complex to predict. Just give >WebSTAR lots of RAM and watch its 'high-water' marker to see what's needed.If you're referring to that cute little green block in the WebSTAR status window, I don't see that anymore because I went back to 1.3.2 - after I ran into the problem of too few nested tags with the WebCat plugin. Do you have any ideas for checking the 'high-water' level with WebSTAR 1.3.2?Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Individual Tax on Items (1998) WCS Newbie question (1997) SV: Strange sort in search... (2000) [WebDNA] WebDNA Engine not running (2016) WebCat2b15MacPlugIn - [authenticate] not [protect] (1997) 2.0 Info (1997) Cumulative Shipping charge calculations - your help please. (1997) ANother SHOWIF problem (1997) Languages (1997) taxTotal (1997) WebCat using all my CPU on OS X Server (2001) help on brickwalls (2003) Date conversion (2002) Creditcard verification with WebCat (1998) Vann's - nice new WebCatalog site (1998) W* 4.2 / WebCat (TPro) 3.0.5b / OS 8.5.1 / BW G3 (2000) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) [SearchString] usage (1997) OT: Validating user input (2004) Trouble with formula.db (1997)