Re: [WebDNA] improvements
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2015
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 111949
interpreted = N
texte = --54b95935_4db127f8_12a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I think both additions would be great, and I would use both depending on = what makes most sense to me in the context of what I=E2=80=99m working on= . If you are limiting =5Bswitch=5D to =5Bshowif=5D comparisons rather than = the more robust =5Bif=5D comparisons, then absolutely =5Belseif=5D would = still be needed. =E2=80=94 Brian =46ries On January 16, 2015 at 10:21:59 AM, Jym Duane (jym=40purposemedia.com) wr= ote: If we work on the =5Bswitch=5D cell to introduce the full set of comparis= ons available with =5Bshowif=5D, will you all still need the =5Belseif=5D= =3F=C2=A0 I ask because if seems to me this is something missing with =5Bswitch=5D = that should have been there in the first place, but the =5Belseif=5D conc= ept could show a little bit heavy and less elegant=E2=80=A6=C2=A0 --54b95935_4db127f8_12a Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline