Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems]

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2015


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 111958
interpreted = N
texte = --Apple-Mail=_97D72F2F-95CE-4848-A199-10BCC74650F5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 If I'm to add my 2=A2 to this... There has to be careful consideration = weighing performance impact vs new tag value. I have no disagreement = with something simple like [realIP], but if a set of variables can be = easily stored in an include file, I am in disagreement with adding extra = code to, for instance, create persistent variables, if adding the extra = code has any negative impact on overall performance. I like the lean = machine that is WebDNA. I'd prefer to only make additions where either = the functionality cannot be achieved within the current language, or = could be made significantly easier without performance degradation. As far as the other teasers, Chris, I have yet to see a method to = maintain session status across stateless/sessionless http requests = without using either javascript, cookies or a session variable. I've = done experimentation with "browser fingerprint" using any and all = headers, but this has never proved to be bulletproof given the = increasing popularity of VPN services and other various proxies. = Javascript has some nifty ways of storing data across pages (and even = domains) but I would be curious how that could be used by WebDNAEngine, = as it would essentially need to be injected into the content of our = documents and of course not work if javascript is disabled. Instead of = leaving us on the edge of our seats, It might be advantageous to all = involved to bring this to group discussion. Thanks,=20 Mike [squarebrackethead] > On Jan 16, 2015, at 5:35 AM, Kenneth Grome = wrote: >=20 >> WebDNA is a different concept ... so don=92t expect WebDNA to >> start adopting other languages syntax and architecture. >=20 > I think this is the right decision. Thanks Chris. >=20 > Regards, > Kenneth Grome > WebDNA Solutions > http://www.webdnasolutions.com > Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail=_97D72F2F-95CE-4848-A199-10BCC74650F5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 If I'm to add my 2=A2 to this...  There has to be = careful consideration weighing performance impact vs new tag value. =  I have no disagreement with something simple like [realIP], but if = a set of variables can be easily stored in an include file, I am in = disagreement with adding extra code to, for instance, create persistent = variables, if adding the extra code has any negative impact on overall = performance.  I like the lean machine that is WebDNA.  I'd = prefer to only make additions where either the functionality cannot be = achieved within the current language, or could be made significantly easier without performance degradation.

As far as the other = teasers, Chris, I have yet to see a method to maintain session status = across stateless/sessionless http requests without using either = javascript, cookies or a session variable.  I've done = experimentation with "browser fingerprint" using any and all headers, = but this has never proved to be bulletproof given the increasing = popularity of VPN services and other various proxies.  Javascript = has some nifty ways of storing data across pages (and even domains) but = I would be curious how that could be used by WebDNAEngine, as it would = essentially need to be injected into the content of our documents and of = course not work if javascript is disabled.  Instead of leaving us = on the edge of our seats, It might be advantageous to all involved to = bring this to group discussion.



Thanks, 
Mike
[squarebrackethead]



On Jan 16, 2015, at 5:35 AM, Kenneth Grome = <ken@webdnasolutions.com> wrote:

WebDNA is a different concept ... so don=92t = expect WebDNA to
start adopting other languages syntax and = architecture.

I think this is = the right decision.  Thanks Chris.

Regards,
Kenneth Grome
WebDNA = Solutions
http://www.webdnasolutions.com
Web Database = Systems and Linux Server Management


---------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <talk@webdna.us>.
To = unsubscribe, E-mail to: <talk-leave@webdna.us>
archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us
Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us

= --Apple-Mail=_97D72F2F-95CE-4848-A199-10BCC74650F5-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2015)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Michael Davis 2015)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2015)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Stuart Tremain 2015)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Dan Strong 2015)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Brian Burton 2015)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Brian Burton 2015)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Dan Strong 2015)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Brian Burton 2015)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (=?utf-8?Q?iPhonzie=40G?= 2015)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Brian Burton 2015)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Dan Strong 2015)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (=?utf-8?Q?iPhonzie=40G?= 2015)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (=?utf-8?Q?iPhonzie=40G?= 2015)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2015)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (=?utf-8?Q?iPhonzie=40G?= 2015)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (=?utf-8?Q?iPhonzie=40G?= 2015)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Stephen Reiss 2015)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Terry Wilson 2015)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Terry Wilson 2015)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Lawrence Banahan 2015)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] ("Psi Prime Inc, Matthew A Perosi " 2015)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Terry Wilson 2015)
  34. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  35. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  36. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Terry Wilson 2015)
  37. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  38. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  39. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  40. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2015)
  41. Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  42. [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (Brian Burton 2015)
--Apple-Mail=_97D72F2F-95CE-4848-A199-10BCC74650F5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 If I'm to add my 2=A2 to this... There has to be careful consideration = weighing performance impact vs new tag value. I have no disagreement = with something simple like [realIP], but if a set of variables can be = easily stored in an include file, I am in disagreement with adding extra = code to, for instance, create persistent variables, if adding the extra = code has any negative impact on overall performance. I like the lean = machine that is WebDNA. I'd prefer to only make additions where either = the functionality cannot be achieved within the current language, or = could be made significantly easier without performance degradation. As far as the other teasers, Chris, I have yet to see a method to = maintain session status across stateless/sessionless http requests = without using either javascript, cookies or a session variable. I've = done experimentation with "browser fingerprint" using any and all = headers, but this has never proved to be bulletproof given the = increasing popularity of VPN services and other various proxies. = Javascript has some nifty ways of storing data across pages (and even = domains) but I would be curious how that could be used by WebDNAEngine, = as it would essentially need to be injected into the content of our = documents and of course not work if javascript is disabled. Instead of = leaving us on the edge of our seats, It might be advantageous to all = involved to bring this to group discussion. Thanks,=20 Mike [squarebrackethead] > On Jan 16, 2015, at 5:35 AM, Kenneth Grome = wrote: >=20 >> WebDNA is a different concept ... so don=92t expect WebDNA to >> start adopting other languages syntax and architecture. >=20 > I think this is the right decision. Thanks Chris. >=20 > Regards, > Kenneth Grome > WebDNA Solutions > http://www.webdnasolutions.com > Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail=_97D72F2F-95CE-4848-A199-10BCC74650F5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 If I'm to add my 2=A2 to this...  There has to be = careful consideration weighing performance impact vs new tag value. =  I have no disagreement with something simple like [realIP], but if = a set of variables can be easily stored in an include file, I am in = disagreement with adding extra code to, for instance, create persistent = variables, if adding the extra code has any negative impact on overall = performance.  I like the lean machine that is WebDNA.  I'd = prefer to only make additions where either the functionality cannot be = achieved within the current language, or could be made significantly easier without performance degradation.

As far as the other = teasers, Chris, I have yet to see a method to maintain session status = across stateless/sessionless http requests without using either = javascript, cookies or a session variable.  I've done = experimentation with "browser fingerprint" using any and all headers, = but this has never proved to be bulletproof given the increasing = popularity of VPN services and other various proxies.  Javascript = has some nifty ways of storing data across pages (and even domains) but = I would be curious how that could be used by WebDNAEngine, as it would = essentially need to be injected into the content of our documents and of = course not work if javascript is disabled.  Instead of leaving us = on the edge of our seats, It might be advantageous to all involved to = bring this to group discussion.



Thanks, 
Mike
[squarebrackethead]



On Jan 16, 2015, at 5:35 AM, Kenneth Grome = <ken@webdnasolutions.com> wrote:

WebDNA is a different concept ... so don=92t = expect WebDNA to
start adopting other languages syntax and = architecture.

I think this is = the right decision.  Thanks Chris.

Regards,
Kenneth Grome
WebDNA = Solutions
http://www.webdnasolutions.com
Web Database = Systems and Linux Server Management


---------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <talk@webdna.us>.
To = unsubscribe, E-mail to: <talk-leave@webdna.us>
archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us
Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us

= --Apple-Mail=_97D72F2F-95CE-4848-A199-10BCC74650F5-- Michael Davis

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997) SKU (1997) BBEdit and WebCatalog 2.0? (1997) The Robert Elliot Report? (2006) Replacing entry (1998) PIXO support (1997) Electronic Delivery (1997) Help name our technology! I found it (1997) CC Merchant suggestions?? (1997) [WebDNA] UPS XML GIF Base64 (2012) More Shopping Cart Problems (2000) Uh...can someone help me out with the b10? (1997) Re2: Calculating multiple shipping... (1997) [Off] Netscape Display Problem (1998) WebCatalog 2.1 for NT (1998) Runtime (1998) Template not found error messages (1997) WebCat2b14MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't hide the search string (1997) Template Encryption (1998) Too many wrong answers! (1998)