Re: [WebDNA] [store] and [recall]: default db location

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2015


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112074
interpreted = N
texte = > Why would it matter if the same volume of data were stored in a > single db or in separate dbs? Just want to take this opportunity to make a parenthesis: several small = databases are usually faster than a large one. Why is this? because one = single modification in a database, in case "Automatically commit = databases to disk after modification" is checked, will have to write few = hundred KB or few MB instead of tens or hundreds of MB to disk. Also, = smaller databases use smaller chunks of RAM. For a instance, a *very* large database with millions of entries would = be faster if split, using a small switch as entry point. For instance = let say the database stores names. It is divided into 26 smaller db, = each one storing the names starting with a specific letter: "a", "b", = "c", "d", =85 The entry point (search, append, whatever=85) will extract the first = letter of the query and point the query at the proper db. Since we can expect that not all the databases will be opened at the = same time, RAM usage will also be lower, and a very large database = (several GB) will be easier to open if the server does not have a lot of = RAM. - chris= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] [store] and [recall]: default db location (WebDNA TPP 2015)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] [store] and [recall]: default db location (Terry Wilson 2015)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] [store] and [recall]: default db location (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] [store] and [recall]: default db location (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] [store] and [recall]: default db location (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] [store] and [recall]: default db location (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2015)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] [store] and [recall]: default db location (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] [store] and [recall]: default db location (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2015)
  9. [WebDNA] [store] and [recall]: default db location (Kenneth Grome 2015)
> Why would it matter if the same volume of data were stored in a > single db or in separate dbs? Just want to take this opportunity to make a parenthesis: several small = databases are usually faster than a large one. Why is this? because one = single modification in a database, in case "Automatically commit = databases to disk after modification" is checked, will have to write few = hundred KB or few MB instead of tens or hundreds of MB to disk. Also, = smaller databases use smaller chunks of RAM. For a instance, a *very* large database with millions of entries would = be faster if split, using a small switch as entry point. For instance = let say the database stores names. It is divided into 26 smaller db, = each one storing the names starting with a specific letter: "a", "b", = "c", "d", =85 The entry point (search, append, whatever=85) will extract the first = letter of the query and point the query at the proper db. Since we can expect that not all the databases will be opened at the = same time, RAM usage will also be lower, and a very large database = (several GB) will be easier to open if the server does not have a lot of = RAM. - chris= christophe.billiottet@webdna.us

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

I give up!! (1997) Strange Search Results (2004) WebCat2 - storing unformatted date data? (1997) buy 2 items get this free (2003) I forgot (1998) Multiple prices (1997) Truncated value after space - refresh my memory.... (1997) SQL Madness (2005) convert characters (2003) shortening the cart (1998) Languages (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) [defined]ish (1997) ShowCart (2001) bannerads (1998) WebCat b13 CGI -shownext- (1997) Two options to consider (2008) Webcatalog server support (1997) Re:no [search] with NT (1997) RE: Problems with dbcatalog.exe (1997)