[WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2016


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112748
interpreted = N
texte = 331 --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Just curious. Whats the most lookups and/or searches you've even had on a page. I have a page being worked on that seems to have way tooo many of both so I'm slimming things down with text variables. Seems clunky the way I have it setup now. Currently there 14 searches and 57 lookups or so. I can slim that down to 7 searches, probably no fewer than that, the number of lookups I'm just starting to slim down.... I believe the docs also said the number of text variables is dependent on available ram. Is it bad to have a whole of text variables on a page? I'm guessing if this one page is accessed by many people at once then all those text variables in ram start to add up? That being the case am I better off having more searches and/or lookups than going the text variable route. --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just curious.

Whats the most lookups an= d/or searches you've even had on a page.

I hav= e a page being worked on that seems to have way tooo many of both so I'= m slimming things down with text variables. Seems clunky the way I have it = setup now.

Currently there 14 searches and 57 look= ups or so. I can slim that down to 7 searches, probably no fewer than that,= the number of lookups I'm just starting to slim down....=C2=A0

I believe the docs also said the number of text variables= is dependent on available ram.

Is it bad to have = a whole of text variables on a page?

I'm guess= ing if this one page is accessed by many people at once then all those text= variables in ram start to add up? That being the case am I better off havi= ng more searches and/or lookups than going the text variable route.


--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11-- . Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page (Kenneth Grome 2016)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page ("Matthew A Perosi, Psi Prime" 2016)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page (Richard Kwasniewski 2016)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page (Kenneth Grome 2016)
  5. [WebDNA] max number of searches and lookups on a page (Richard Kwasniewski 2016)
331 --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Just curious. Whats the most lookups and/or searches you've even had on a page. I have a page being worked on that seems to have way tooo many of both so I'm slimming things down with text variables. Seems clunky the way I have it setup now. Currently there 14 searches and 57 lookups or so. I can slim that down to 7 searches, probably no fewer than that, the number of lookups I'm just starting to slim down.... I believe the docs also said the number of text variables is dependent on available ram. Is it bad to have a whole of text variables on a page? I'm guessing if this one page is accessed by many people at once then all those text variables in ram start to add up? That being the case am I better off having more searches and/or lookups than going the text variable route. --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just curious.

Whats the most lookups an= d/or searches you've even had on a page.

I hav= e a page being worked on that seems to have way tooo many of both so I'= m slimming things down with text variables. Seems clunky the way I have it = setup now.

Currently there 14 searches and 57 look= ups or so. I can slim that down to 7 searches, probably no fewer than that,= the number of lookups I'm just starting to slim down....=C2=A0

I believe the docs also said the number of text variables= is dependent on available ram.

Is it bad to have = a whole of text variables on a page?

I'm guess= ing if this one page is accessed by many people at once then all those text= variables in ram start to add up? That being the case am I better off havi= ng more searches and/or lookups than going the text variable route.


--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --089e0112c86ed16db90531b30f11-- . Richard Kwasniewski

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

I found a bug ... (1997) creator code (1997) New Web Site Developers Database (1996) [WebDNA] postfix and dna (2011) Forcing a NEWCART (1997) NT Version on IIS 4.0 (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997) WebCat vs. ASP (1999) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) Nested tags count question (1997) quantity minimum problem (1997) Converting Quotes in Javascript (2001) same product in cart (1997) Further tests with the infamous shipCost (1997) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997) UPS (2003) OK, here goes... (1997) Linux ODBC and the ODBC Bridge (2000) orderfile stuff (1998)