Re: [WebDNA] upgrading to 8.1 or 8.2?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2016


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112843
interpreted = N
texte = 426 Hi Matt, Thanks for reply. What versions of CentOS and WebDNA server were you using before 8.2 that was stable for you? On 06/21/2016 03:08 PM, Matthew Perosi wrote: > My 100% WebDNA written CMS has the power to run 3 different domain names or sub domains from the same Apache using aliases. > > The domain names are things like www.domain.com or m.domain.com or domain.mobi, etc. the CMS is designed to serve different content layouts for desktop, mobile, and tablet. > > If I understand correctly, with fast cgi 8.x I'd have to pay for a license for each domain even though it's all in the same Apache . > > I have tried this yet. The 8.2 server version is causing server crashes on CentOS 7 at least 2x per week that I have not been able to isolate. The fast cgi sounds like an option, but I do need to know hot to account for multiple domains fed through the same CMS Isi g different content templates. > > -Matt > > Sent from my European iPhone > > On Jun 21, 2016, at 8:08 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > >>> * 1 - Is there a speed/performance difference between the Server and FastCGI versions? >> The FastCGI is slightly faster >> >>> ** 1a - Does V8.1 only run on CentOS 6 or will it also run on CentOS 7 >> the last version is 8.2 and it runs on CentOS 7. Not tested yet on CentOS 8 but it should not be a problem. >> >>> *** What versions of apache will work for the above? >> 2.4 >> >>> ** 2 - Will all of the WebDNA code in my templates written using V6.2 be interpreted without the need for any modifications? >> should be, yes >> >>> ** 3 - If you suggest the fastCGI, I understand there is a different licencse for each domain. If I purchase a second license for ocassional charity sites of which I typically on have one of these running in addition to my main site, will the license allow the re-naming of a domain? >> no, each FastCGI license is associated with a domain name. However, if it is for charity, we might help here. >> >> >>> ** 4 - Is removing WebDNA 6.2 as easy as just removing it from the cgi-bin directory? >> >> yes, but careful if you are using /globals and sandboxes. This is where the content is. >> >> I suggest we follow this at support@webdna.us as it should have been from start, since this is for support / private requests. >> >> - chris >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us . Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] upgrading to 8.1 or 8.2? (Kenneth Grome 2016)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] upgrading to 8.1 or 8.2? (WebDNA Steve Raslevich 2016)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] upgrading to 8.1 or 8.2? (WebDNA Steve Raslevich 2016)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] upgrading to 8.1 or 8.2? (Kenneth Grome 2016)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] upgrading to 8.1 or 8.2? (Matthew Perosi 2016)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] upgrading to 8.1 or 8.2? (WebDNA 2016)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] upgrading to 8.1 or 8.2? (WebDNA 2016)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] upgrading to 8.1 or 8.2? (Kenneth Grome 2016)
426 Hi Matt, Thanks for reply. What versions of CentOS and WebDNA server were you using before 8.2 that was stable for you? On 06/21/2016 03:08 PM, Matthew Perosi wrote: > My 100% WebDNA written CMS has the power to run 3 different domain names or sub domains from the same Apache using aliases. > > The domain names are things like www.domain.com or m.domain.com or domain.mobi, etc. the CMS is designed to serve different content layouts for desktop, mobile, and tablet. > > If I understand correctly, with fast cgi 8.x I'd have to pay for a license for each domain even though it's all in the same Apache . > > I have tried this yet. The 8.2 server version is causing server crashes on CentOS 7 at least 2x per week that I have not been able to isolate. The fast cgi sounds like an option, but I do need to know hot to account for multiple domains fed through the same CMS Isi g different content templates. > > -Matt > > Sent from my European iPhone > > On Jun 21, 2016, at 8:08 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > >>> * 1 - Is there a speed/performance difference between the Server and FastCGI versions? >> The FastCGI is slightly faster >> >>> ** 1a - Does V8.1 only run on CentOS 6 or will it also run on CentOS 7 >> the last version is 8.2 and it runs on CentOS 7. Not tested yet on CentOS 8 but it should not be a problem. >> >>> *** What versions of apache will work for the above? >> 2.4 >> >>> ** 2 - Will all of the WebDNA code in my templates written using V6.2 be interpreted without the need for any modifications? >> should be, yes >> >>> ** 3 - If you suggest the fastCGI, I understand there is a different licencse for each domain. If I purchase a second license for ocassional charity sites of which I typically on have one of these running in addition to my main site, will the license allow the re-naming of a domain? >> no, each FastCGI license is associated with a domain name. However, if it is for charity, we might help here. >> >> >>> ** 4 - Is removing WebDNA 6.2 as easy as just removing it from the cgi-bin directory? >> >> yes, but careful if you are using /globals and sandboxes. This is where the content is. >> >> I suggest we follow this at support@webdna.us as it should have been from start, since this is for support / private requests. >> >> - chris >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us . WebDNA

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Search results templates (1996) Webcat 2.0.1b1 bug with IE 3.01/4.0p1 (1997) New Web Site Developers Database (1996) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) Fun with Dates - revisited (1997) Error Log.db --however (1997) (2003) Odd [math] behavior (2003) Comparing two fields so the match (1998) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) can WC render sites out? (1997) Requiring that certain fields be completed (1997) RE: Error -108 (1997) F*** you (1998) Browser Info.txt (1997) unitshipcost vs shipcosts (1997) WebDNA module - Automated database archiving (1997) If Empty ? (1997) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997)