Re: A multi-processor savvy WebCatalog?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 11433
interpreted = N
texte = >>I found this at WebSTAR-Talk, and it made me think about WebCatalog in >>terms of potential increases in speed in the future. I know you're not >>ready to do this now, but I saw it so I thought I'd report it here because >>it almost seems like Wesley is talking about WebCatalog specifically. > >Yes, and Apple Envangelist approached us about this a while ago, and >you're right we're not quite ready to implement it. So far we haven't had >any complaints about speed, but we're always looking for ways to improve >the product. Certain technical aspects of WebCatalog's design make it >ideal for a multi-processor environment.This is good news, thanks Grant. I'm always on the lookout for ways to speed things up, even though WebCat is already very fast. I almost went out and bought a multi-processor Mac last year - until I learned that it wouldn't do a thing for WebSTAR to speed it up. But if it will speed up WebCatalog some day, that's what I would really be interested in ... :)Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com http://usarea.net/home.html Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: A multi-processor savvy WebCatalog? (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  2. Re: A multi-processor savvy WebCatalog? (Nelson Chen 1997)
  3. Re: A multi-processor savvy WebCatalog? (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  4. A multi-processor savvy WebCatalog? (Kenneth Grome 1997)
>>I found this at WebSTAR-Talk, and it made me think about WebCatalog in >>terms of potential increases in speed in the future. I know you're not >>ready to do this now, but I saw it so I thought I'd report it here because >>it almost seems like Wesley is talking about WebCatalog specifically. > >Yes, and Apple Envangelist approached us about this a while ago, and >you're right we're not quite ready to implement it. So far we haven't had >any complaints about speed, but we're always looking for ways to improve >the product. Certain technical aspects of WebCatalog's design make it >ideal for a multi-processor environment.This is good news, thanks Grant. I'm always on the lookout for ways to speed things up, even though WebCat is already very fast. I almost went out and bought a multi-processor Mac last year - until I learned that it wouldn't do a thing for WebSTAR to speed it up. But if it will speed up WebCatalog some day, that's what I would really be interested in ... :)Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com http://usarea.net/home.html Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat2.0 [format thousands .0f] no go (1997) [lineitems] (2000) Signal Raised Error (Part II) (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA 7 (2011) Apache 2.0 question (AddModule mod_webcatalog.cpp) (2008) Search (1997) 2.01 upgrade problems (1997) Re[2]: Images (2000) RE: OK, here goes... (1997) WebDNA 4.5.1 Now Available [OT] (2003) removelineitems (2000) Re:quit command on NT (1997) [Sum] function? (1997) Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) WCS Newbie question (1997) webcat page crashes MSIE 5 on mac (2000) WEBDNA tags don't process in a .js file (2002) [WebDNA] [middle] (2015) really wierd browser truncating (1997) Version number missing (was Mondo amounts of Mail [long]) (1999)