[WebDNA] Windows FastCGI thisurl issues
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2018
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 114403
interpreted = N
texte = 2022 --_000_DF89B680A72D1D49A4CE61BDF2F53CDA274617D1OCB56oswegoboce_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, We have been playing with the Windows FastCGI 8.6.1 to see if it is an opti= on for our migration from the Windows 6.2 server version. We have noticed t= hough that the thisurl and thisurlplusget tag seem to return nothing- wonde= ring if anyone else has experienced this issue on Windows. Also, we have noticed that the '/' and '\' file separators function differe= ntly than in the previous version. In 6.2, both could be used interchangeab= ly where as in 8.6.1 '\' seems to be used for the root path and '/' seems t= o be the relative path of the file. Before we start doing the heavy lift of= updating the paths in our code I was curious if this was intentional or if= it is something that can be adjusted. Thanks for all the help! Matthew Buske Database Administrator Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation --_000_DF89B680A72D1D49A4CE61BDF2F53CDA274617D1OCB56oswegoboce_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
We have been playing with the Windows FastCGI 8.6.1 = to see if it is an option for our migration from the Windows 6.2 server ver= sion. We have noticed though that the thisurl and thisurlplusget tag seem t= o return nothing- wondering if anyone else has experienced this issue on Windows.
Also, we have noticed that the ‘/’ and &= #8216;\’ file separators function differently than in the previous ve= rsion. In 6.2, both could be used interchangeably where as in 8.6.1 ‘= \’ seems to be used for the root path and ‘/’ seems to be= the relative path of the file. Before we start doing the heavy lift of updating the pat= hs in our code I was curious if this was intentional or if it is something = that can be adjusted.
Thanks for all the help!
Matthew Buske
Database Administrator
Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation<= o:p>
--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list talk@webdna.us To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --_000_DF89B680A72D1D49A4CE61BDF2F53CDA274617D1OCB56oswegoboce_-- .
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
2022 --_000_DF89B680A72D1D49A4CE61BDF2F53CDA274617D1OCB56oswegoboce_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, We have been playing with the Windows FastCGI 8.6.1 to see if it is an opti= on for our migration from the Windows 6.2 server version. We have noticed t= hough that the thisurl and thisurlplusget tag seem to return nothing- wonde= ring if anyone else has experienced this issue on Windows. Also, we have noticed that the '/' and '\' file separators function differe= ntly than in the previous version. In 6.2, both could be used interchangeab= ly where as in 8.6.1 '\' seems to be used for the root path and '/' seems t= o be the relative path of the file. Before we start doing the heavy lift of= updating the paths in our code I was curious if this was intentional or if= it is something that can be adjusted. Thanks for all the help! Matthew Buske Database Administrator Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation --_000_DF89B680A72D1D49A4CE61BDF2F53CDA274617D1OCB56oswegoboce_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
We have been playing with the Windows FastCGI 8.6.1 = to see if it is an option for our migration from the Windows 6.2 server ver= sion. We have noticed though that the thisurl and thisurlplusget tag seem t= o return nothing- wondering if anyone else has experienced this issue on Windows.
Also, we have noticed that the ‘/’ and &= #8216;\’ file separators function differently than in the previous ve= rsion. In 6.2, both could be used interchangeably where as in 8.6.1 ‘= \’ seems to be used for the root path and ‘/’ seems to be= the relative path of the file. Before we start doing the heavy lift of updating the pat= hs in our code I was curious if this was intentional or if it is something = that can be adjusted.
Thanks for all the help!
Matthew Buske
Database Administrator
Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation<= o:p>
--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list talk@webdna.us To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --_000_DF89B680A72D1D49A4CE61BDF2F53CDA274617D1OCB56oswegoboce_-- .
"Buske, Matthew"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Addlineitems ... grrr (2004)
RE: IIS4b2 and WebCatalog b19 (1997)
apostrophe in search item (1997)
group searching problem (2002)
Reverse dating (1999)
Merging databases (1997)
WriteFile (2000)
Opinion: [input] should be called [output] ... (1997)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
Smart caching problems with 2.1b3? (1997)
Maybe minor bug report (1997)
WebCat2.0 [format thousands .0f] no go (1997)
instant cookies? (1999)
Virtual hosting and webcatNT (1997)
OK, here goes... (1997)
OPEN MARKET PATENTS SOUND ECOMMERCE ALARM (1998)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
webmerchant problems (2000)
Repost: pulldown menu (2000)
Formulas.db + Users.db (1997)