Re: No luck with taxes

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 12487
interpreted = N
texte = >>Whenever you have a formula inside a database field, you have to 'tell' >>WebCat2 to interpret that formula by enclosing it inside an [interpret] >>context. > >Sorry, that's not always true, Ken. Since I designed the formulas from >the beginning with the idea that they would be interpreted, WebCatalog >already knows to interpret the formulas. But that's because formulas are >a special case. > >If you have some WebDNA in some arbitrary database, and you want >WebCatalog to 'execute' it rather than displaying it literally, then Ken's >statement is true. I think I wrote it up in the online docs for >[Interpret].Thanks for correcting me about this, Grant. I realized my mistake after I read Kevin's message saying he had restarted and it worked correctly after that ... but I was too tired by that time to really think about it and recognize the 'real' situation and to post a message retracting my earlier statements ... :) Thanks again!Sincerely, Ken Grome WebDNA Solutionshttp://www.hui.net/dna/webdna.html Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: No luck with taxes (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  2. Re: No luck with taxes (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  3. Re: No luck with taxes (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  4. Re: No luck with taxes (Kevin Furuta 1997)
  5. Re: No luck with taxes (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  6. No luck with taxes (Kevin Furuta 1997)
>>Whenever you have a formula inside a database field, you have to 'tell' >>WebCat2 to interpret that formula by enclosing it inside an [interpret] >>context. > >Sorry, that's not always true, Ken. Since I designed the formulas from >the beginning with the idea that they would be interpreted, WebCatalog >already knows to interpret the formulas. But that's because formulas are >a special case. > >If you have some WebDNA in some arbitrary database, and you want >WebCatalog to 'execute' it rather than displaying it literally, then Ken's >statement is true. I think I wrote it up in the online docs for >[interpret].Thanks for correcting me about this, Grant. I realized my mistake after I read Kevin's message saying he had restarted and it worked correctly after that ... but I was too tired by that time to really think about it and recognize the 'real' situation and to post a message retracting my earlier statements ... :) Thanks again!Sincerely, Ken Grome WebDNA Solutionshttp://www.hui.net/dna/webdna.html Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WHY SO MANY DUPLICATES? (1999) Error.html (1997) Looking up two prices in database? (1997) shell problems again... (2003) WC Database Format (1997) All questions are welcome on this list (1997) Sending E-mail (1997) Suffix Mapping (1997) [WebDNA] New 7.1.702 version (2012) Write to the desktop? (2002) calculating tax rates, mail order solutions and version 2 (1997) Ooops-Serial Number for NT (1997) updating with ProductEditor (1998) Re:ListFields and [name] (1997) Request Time Out (1997) IE Cache Problems... (1999) More Applescript (1997) Error 11 (1996) emailer w/F2 (1997) New index for docs (1997)