Re: New servers and new inline cache

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 12983
interpreted = N
texte = >Speaking of cache...I have a dumb question. When I display a very large >webcatalog database over a 28.8 dial up account it pours out in excess of >3.0K per sec. The template when filled aproaches about 90K. However >images using webstar cache come in always in around the 1.4 K per sec >range. Why is this? Is there something about the webcatalog cache system >that is better then the webstar cache system? Or is there a webstar >setting that somebody thinks I should look at. Normally you would be seeing text information being compressed and getting higher K/sec xfers then an already compressed image file would give you. I can see on a 28.8k PPP connection upwards of 4.5 to 5k/sec when Claris Emailer is grabbling email off my server were as grabbing a QT movie or GIF off of anyones server I am lucky to see 2.3 to 2.6k (or slower of course). Nevin Lyne Rendered Visions--- Nevin Lyne Rendered Visions *********************************************************** In Chico, California, City Council enacted a ban on nuclear weapons, setting a $500 fine for anyone detonating one within city limits. Gotta love a College Town! ************************************************************ --- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: New servers and new inline cache (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  2. Re: New servers and new inline cache (N. Lyne 1997)
  3. New servers and new inline cache (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
>Speaking of cache...I have a dumb question. When I display a very large >webcatalog database over a 28.8 dial up account it pours out in excess of >3.0K per sec. The template when filled aproaches about 90K. However >images using webstar cache come in always in around the 1.4 K per sec >range. Why is this? Is there something about the webcatalog cache system >that is better then the webstar cache system? Or is there a webstar >setting that somebody thinks I should look at. Normally you would be seeing text information being compressed and getting higher K/sec xfers then an already compressed image file would give you. I can see on a 28.8k PPP connection upwards of 4.5 to 5k/sec when Claris Emailer is grabbling email off my server were as grabbing a QT movie or GIF off of anyones server I am lucky to see 2.3 to 2.6k (or slower of course). Nevin Lyne Rendered Visions--- Nevin Lyne Rendered Visions *********************************************************** In Chico, California, City Council enacted a ban on nuclear weapons, setting a $500 fine for anyone detonating one within city limits. Gotta love a College Town! ************************************************************ --- N. Lyne

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Re WebDNA has reached it connection limit (2004) Problem with imagemap variables (2006) Search Question (2003) Pithy questions on webcommerce & siteedit (1997) writefiles (1999) RE: Writefile outside WebSTAR hierarchy? (1997) Frames and WebCat (1997) Explorer 3.0/ Access Denied! (1997) OT: Quick poll (2003) searching withe db up three directories not working (1999) move files (2000) nude virgin confusion?? (2004) Make sure I understand this??? (1997) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) For those of you not on the WebCatalog Beta... (1997) OT: Limit on # of Pulldown entries (1997) Highlighting words found in a keyword search (2003) Two submit buttons ? (1997) Webcat 4.5.1 equivalent of autonumber (2003) Commitdatabase tag (1998)