Re: Other tags inside the founditems context?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 17015
interpreted = N
texte = >Is there ANY WAY that an append context inside the founditems loop will >screw up the internal index in the same manner that using delete inside >the founditems context does?No, that should be fine, since none of the found items will be included in the newly-added ones. There is no overlap.>What about a replace context inside a founditems loop?Replace *may* affect it, because a replace has the potential to change the field values in the list of found records. The code looks like replace would *probably* work (because everything is based on record index), but it hasn't been tested so we can't guarantee it.>What about other tags or contexts inside the founditems context?Only tags that affect database records or databases can be a problem. [CloseDatabase], for instance, would be a bad idea inside a [FoundItems] loop. [FlushDatabases], [Delete], [Replace], would also be bad.Technical Support | ==== eCommerce and Beyond ==== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Other tags inside the founditems context? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  2. Other tags inside the founditems context? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
>Is there ANY WAY that an append context inside the founditems loop will >screw up the internal index in the same manner that using delete inside >the founditems context does?No, that should be fine, since none of the found items will be included in the newly-added ones. There is no overlap.>What about a replace context inside a founditems loop?Replace *may* affect it, because a replace has the potential to change the field values in the list of found records. The code looks like replace would *probably* work (because everything is based on record index), but it hasn't been tested so we can't guarantee it.>What about other tags or contexts inside the founditems context?Only tags that affect database records or databases can be a problem. [closedatabase], for instance, would be a bad idea inside a [founditems] loop. [flushdatabases], [delete], [replace], would also be bad.Technical Support | ==== eCommerce and Beyond ==== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/ PCS Technical Support

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Merry Christmas (2006) Suggestion: appendfounditems (2002) [ShowIf] and empty fields (1997) WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997) nesting limits? (1998) re: Large Database Options? (1999) NT Version on IIS 4.0 (1997) emailer (1997) Need relative path explanation (1997) ShowNext (2002) back button problem (1999) Re:Change WebDNA-Talk Mail due to no digest for 1wk (1997) recomend ftp (2001) Will webdna execute before a [redirect]? (1999) Re:no [search] with NT (1997) 4D Database (1997) shipcost vs shiptotal (1998) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997) WebMerchant? (1998) Bad URL reference? (1997)