Re: Date search bug?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 17705
interpreted = N
texte = Hi everyone,While I still recommend using the date formatting suggestions I made available a few days ago, there may be some of you who really don't want to mess around with a change-over like that ... so here's some CRITICAL information that may help to make your existing date range searches work properly:The following exchange occurred between myself and Grant after I sent him some files that demonstrated the date range search bug I discovered:>>Have you or anyone tracked down the date bug with those files I sent you a >>couple days ago? > >It appears to be the comma between the dates in the range. I removed the >comma and got much better-looking results. Sorry about the delay and the >misinformation.Basically, what this means is that the HTML docs are wrong -- you should NOT use a comma to separate the two values in a date range search. Instead, you should try using a blank space (or possibly a plus sign) to separate the two date values.I still don't know whether or not the earliest date value in a date range search needs to be listed first -- or if the order makes no difference. But putting the earliest date value first has eliminated problems reported with some earlier versions of WebCatalog, so it's probably still a good idea to continue that practice, just to be on the safe side ... :)Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Date search bug? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
Hi everyone,While I still recommend using the date formatting suggestions I made available a few days ago, there may be some of you who really don't want to mess around with a change-over like that ... so here's some CRITICAL information that may help to make your existing date range searches work properly:The following exchange occurred between myself and Grant after I sent him some files that demonstrated the date range search bug I discovered:>>Have you or anyone tracked down the date bug with those files I sent you a >>couple days ago? > >It appears to be the comma between the dates in the range. I removed the >comma and got much better-looking results. Sorry about the delay and the >misinformation.Basically, what this means is that the HTML docs are wrong -- you should NOT use a comma to separate the two values in a date range search. Instead, you should try using a blank space (or possibly a plus sign) to separate the two date values.I still don't know whether or not the earliest date value in a date range search needs to be listed first -- or if the order makes no difference. But putting the earliest date value first has eliminated problems reported with some earlier versions of WebCatalog, so it's probably still a good idea to continue that practice, just to be on the safe side ... :)Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebMerchant Error (1998) Execute Applescript (1997) [WebDNA] Date/time server vs. browser (2015) [ot] iBook vs. 12" PB (2004) Problems passing [SKU] with $Replace in 2.0 (1997) searchable list archive (1997) dates as search criteria (2000) [ot] ShowIf & HideIf Question (1998) Security problems (2000) [WebDNA] help with [ReturnRaw] - why is it killing the parse of the [include] file? (2009) Need help with emailer- 2 issues (1997) Updating a database once per day - An example (1998) Limiting user access to .tmpl files (1997) Webmerchant quitting (1998) Opinion: [input] should be called [output] ... (1997) A dynamic database. (1997) [bump -SMSI] Sitebuilder (2004) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) Problem (1997) [OT] html background att (2003)