Re: WebSTAR and WebSTAR/SSL with WebCatalog plugins

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 18899
interpreted = N
texte = >>may be just to switch to WebTen, which uses plugins for both sides, and is >>faster overall).According som recent testings the people at Clearway have done this isn't really true:- - - cut - - -The big surprise (kind of) was that when both WebSTAR and WebTen are running under OpenTransport 1.3 (level playing field), WebSTAR is appreciably faster then WebTen. And with NITRO 2.0b1 installed, WebSTAR was about _twice_ as fast as WebTen for plain binary file hits.And switching to the Tenon TCP/IP stack speeds up _both_ servers. WebTen gets more of a speed-up than WebSTAR with the Tenon stack, probably because of the low-level coupling of the Tenon ethernet driver and the WebTen engine. (And don't ask how we made WebSTAR use the Tenon TCP stack - it wasn't pretty and I wouldn't recommend it - but it DID make WebSTAR respond faster, which was interesting.)To me, this is more data that suggests that OpenTransport 2.0 will close the 'binary file hits per second' gap.- - - end cut - - - ************************************************************* Christer Olsson Stora Nygatan 21 Phone +46 40 791 50 Art director S-211 37 Malmoe Fax +46 40 97 99 77 Ljusa Ideer AB Sweden http://www.ljusaideer.se Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebSTAR and WebSTAR/SSL with WebCatalog plugins (Charles Kefauver 1998)
  2. Re: WebSTAR and WebSTAR/SSL with WebCatalog plugins (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  3. Re: WebSTAR and WebSTAR/SSL with WebCatalog plugins (Christer Olsson 1998)
  4. Re: WebSTAR and WebSTAR/SSL with WebCatalog plugins (Charles Kefauver 1998)
  5. WebSTAR and WebSTAR/SSL with WebCatalog plugins (PCS Technical Support 1998)
>>may be just to switch to WebTen, which uses plugins for both sides, and is >>faster overall).According som recent testings the people at Clearway have done this isn't really true:- - - cut - - -The big surprise (kind of) was that when both WebSTAR and WebTen are running under OpenTransport 1.3 (level playing field), WebSTAR is appreciably faster then WebTen. And with NITRO 2.0b1 installed, WebSTAR was about _twice_ as fast as WebTen for plain binary file hits.And switching to the Tenon TCP/IP stack speeds up _both_ servers. WebTen gets more of a speed-up than WebSTAR with the Tenon stack, probably because of the low-level coupling of the Tenon ethernet driver and the WebTen engine. (And don't ask how we made WebSTAR use the Tenon TCP stack - it wasn't pretty and I wouldn't recommend it - but it DID make WebSTAR respond faster, which was interesting.)To me, this is more data that suggests that OpenTransport 2.0 will close the 'binary file hits per second' gap.- - - end cut - - - ************************************************************* Christer Olsson Stora Nygatan 21 Phone +46 40 791 50 Art director S-211 37 Malmoe Fax +46 40 97 99 77 Ljusa Ideer AB Sweden http://www.ljusaideer.se Christer Olsson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

ampersand (1998) Robust WebDNA Job Manager / Accountant (2006) Getting Emailer to send mail (1997) [SHOWIF]s and empty arguments (1997) How to append text after the sign & (1997) Just Testing (1997) [ListFiles] context & alias (1997) synching databases on multiple servers (1997) TCP Connect (2000) bug in [SendMail] (1997) [ConvertChars] problem (1997) WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997) [WebDNA] Upper ASCII and charset [OT] (2016) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) Sale on wholesale programming services ... (2006) help on brickwalls (2003) [WebDNA] [BULK] users.db password lost (2011) cybercash (1998) Looping Search Results - Duh! (2000) Referrer field to header field conversion (1997)