RE: redirect with more than 256 characters

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1999

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 22545
interpreted = N
texte = >>>I got more than 256 to pass with redirect, but after a certainly number it>>>fails. Doesn't using TCPConnect embedded the results of that page to the>>>current template? I would like to move to a whole new template after my>>>error checking has passed.>>>>I would suggest you to not use [REDIRECT], use [INCLUDE] instead - if all>>the pages involved are located on the same server.>>>>(BTW: I would suspect any Variables set by the latest POST action are still>>availible on the page you redirect your visitor to - but not any [MATH] or>>[TEXT] variables. So a hack would be to pass just those variables.)>>I don't think the POST variables are passed thru on a [redirect]. It seems>I remember this from my testing a long time ago, but I could be mistaken.>Has anyone tested this recently?Sorry, my mistake. We're using something like this in a NetCloak solutionwe built years ago, so I assumed WebCat could handle it, too - but it can't.You can find my test files at:http://www.ljusaideer.se/dev/redirect/At the page served by WebCat backend through Netcloak you can see NetCloakshowing variables on the same page WebCat don't. ************************************************************* Christer Olsson Stora Nygatan 21 Phone +46 40 791 50 Ljusa Ideer AB S-211 37 Malmoe Fax +46 40 97 99 77 Sweden http://www.ljusaideer.se Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Christer Olsson 1999)
RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Martin Bech 1999)
RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Kenneth Grome 1999)
RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Christer Olsson 1999)
RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Olin Lagon 1999)
RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Kenneth Grome 1999)
RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Olin Lagon 1999)
Re: redirect with more than 256 characters (Kenneth Grome 1999)

>>>I got more than 256 to pass with redirect, but after a certainly number it>>>fails. Doesn't using TCPConnect embedded the results of that page to the>>>current template? I would like to move to a whole new template after my>>>error checking has passed.>>>>I would suggest you to not use [redirect], use [include] instead - if all>>the pages involved are located on the same server.>>>>(BTW: I would suspect any Variables set by the latest POST action are still>>availible on the page you redirect your visitor to - but not any [math] or>>[text] variables. So a hack would be to pass just those variables.)>>I don't think the POST variables are passed thru on a [redirect]. It seems>I remember this from my testing a long time ago, but I could be mistaken.>Has anyone tested this recently?Sorry, my mistake. We're using something like this in a NetCloak solutionwe built years ago, so I assumed WebCat could handle it, too - but it can't.You can find my test files at:http://www.ljusaideer.se/dev/redirect/At the page served by WebCat backend through Netcloak you can see NetCloakshowing variables on the same page WebCat don't. ************************************************************* Christer Olsson Stora Nygatan 21 Phone +46 40 791 50 Ljusa Ideer AB S-211 37 Malmoe Fax +46 40 97 99 77 Sweden http://www.ljusaideer.se Christer Olsson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

RE: redirect with more than 256 characters

1999

Top Articles:

Related Readings: