Re[2]: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison ri

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1999


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 25398
interpreted = N
texte = >I know that it is probably a subtle point for you, but I said I wanted a way to >force a numeric comparison, not that I wanted the tests always carried out as >numeric. For example, see eq vs == in Perl. > >In WebCat's case, I would like $1,000,000 to be considered equivalent to 1000000 >(or even 10e6). Users, being infinitely clever in their innate stupidity, will >type formatting into a cell that you expected to be a number.You can already do what you want with at least two other webcat methods, but of course you already know this. I agree, it would be *easier* for us to have better comparison operators in showif's ... :)================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499, http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re[2]: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison ri (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  2. Re[2]: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison ri (jpeacock@univpress.com 1999)
  3. Re[2]: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison ri (jpeacock@univpress.com 1999)
  4. Re[2]: when is failing to [URL]ize values in a comparison ri (jpeacock@univpress.com 1999)
>I know that it is probably a subtle point for you, but I said I wanted a way to >force a numeric comparison, not that I wanted the tests always carried out as >numeric. For example, see eq vs == in Perl. > >In WebCat's case, I would like $1,000,000 to be considered equivalent to 1000000 >(or even 10e6). Users, being infinitely clever in their innate stupidity, will >type formatting into a cell that you expected to be a number.You can already do what you want with at least two other webcat methods, but of course you already know this. I agree, it would be *easier* for us to have better comparison operators in showif's ... :)================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499, http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

syntax question, not in online refernce (1997) OT : Site speed feedback (2002) PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997) HELP WITH DATES (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997) Search Engine questions ... (2002) RequiredFields template (1997) RE: E-mailer error codes (1997) WebCat on 10.0.4 - iTools 6.0 (2001) [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [founditems] (2015) Max Record length restated as maybe bug (1997) Feedback Please (2003) SSL do I need it?? (1998) Date Formats (1997) Separate SSL Server (1997) Not really WebCat (1997) sendmail and accented characters (1998) Passing WebCat data to SSL server (1997) db access problem after switching to SSL (2001) Converting spaces to + in results list (2000)