Re[2]: Balancing randomness

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 27960
interpreted = N
texte = At 12:44 PM 2/23/00, jpeacock@univpress.com wrote: >...>Unless WebCat does not chose records in the same natural order each time you >do the query (easy enough to check, do the search repeatedly without >performing >the update), the sequence will be the same each time, or at least >substantially >similar. There is nothing random about this sequence.My experience is that WebCat does not choose the records in the same natural order and so any two times through the whole set of records is likely to be in a different order.Again... I'm responding to the original problem where people complained that selecting records from a database based on sdir=ra was random, but was not equitable.___Joe____________________________________________________ Joseph D'Andrea JoeDan@West21.com WEST21.com Internet services for the 21st Century http://www.west21.com/ _________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re[2]: Balancing randomness (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  2. Re[2]: Balancing randomness (Joseph D'Andrea 2000)
  3. Re[2]: Balancing randomness (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  4. Re[2]: Balancing randomness (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
At 12:44 PM 2/23/00, jpeacock@univpress.com wrote: >...>Unless WebCat does not chose records in the same natural order each time you >do the query (easy enough to check, do the search repeatedly without >performing >the update), the sequence will be the same each time, or at least >substantially >similar. There is nothing random about this sequence.My experience is that WebCat does not choose the records in the same natural order and so any two times through the whole set of records is likely to be in a different order.Again... I'm responding to the original problem where people complained that selecting records from a database based on sdir=ra was random, but was not equitable.___Joe____________________________________________________ Joseph D'Andrea JoeDan@West21.com WEST21.com Internet services for the 21st Century http://www.west21.com/ _________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Joseph D'Andrea

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Great product and great job ! (1997) PIXO support (1997) searchable list archive (1997) [WebDNA] wordfile for UltraEdit (2010) No Data Results (1997) Paths (1998) sort problems....bug or brain fart? (1997) Wanted: More Math Functions (or, Can You Solve This?) (1997) Prevent multiple appends with Reload Button (1997) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) Interesting speed comparison .. (2003) Separate SSL Server (1997) Webcat causing crashes left and right! (1997) Runtime (1998) HELP WITH DATES (1997) Newbie from and old bee (1997) Problems with AOHell (1999) ShowNext Command (1997) Grep and Special Characters (2002) Sub Categories (2000)