Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29393
interpreted = N
texte = >In view of the requirement under xHTML that _all_ parameters be >quoted, I think >that has to be your answer. It will not matter now, it may not matter for a >year or two, but if you are going to change it now, you might as >well do it the >right way from the outset.Yeah, that's one of our biggest design concerns, and is why we can't pick some arbitrary syntax just because it might 'look better'. Do you happen to have a URL that would talk more about this aspect?Grant Hulbert, Director of Engineering ********************************** Smith Micro, Internet Solutions Div | eCommerce (WebCatalog) 16855 West Bernardo Drive, #380 | ------------------------- San Diego, CA 92127 | Software & Site Development Main Line: (858) 675-1106 | http://www.smithmicro.com Fax: (858) 675-0372 **********************************############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Rob Marquardt 2000)
  2. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Will Starck 2000)
  3. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  4. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  5. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Charles Kline 2000)
  6. Re[2]: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  7. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Pat McCormick 2000)
  8. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Pat McCormick 2000)
  9. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  10. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  11. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Matt Helbing 2000)
  12. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Pat McCormick 2000)
  13. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Rob Marquardt 2000)
  14. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Thomas Wedderburn-Bisshop 2000)
  15. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  16. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Brice Le Blevennec 2000)
  17. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Brice Le Blevennec 2000)
  18. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  19. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Bob Minor 2000)
  20. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  21. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  22. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  23. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  24. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Charles Kline 2000)
  25. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Peter Ostry 2000)
  26. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Thomas Wedderburn-Bisshop 2000)
  27. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Brian Wallace 2000)
  28. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  29. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Peter Ostry 2000)
  30. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Mike Davis 2000)
  31. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Jym Duane 2000)
  32. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  33. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  34. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Jym Duane 2000)
  35. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Clement Ross 2000)
  36. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Chuck Rice 2000)
  37. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Nitai 2000)
  38. Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Joseph D'Andrea 2000)
  39. New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Grant Hulbert 2000)
>In view of the requirement under xHTML that _all_ parameters be >quoted, I think >that has to be your answer. It will not matter now, it may not matter for a >year or two, but if you are going to change it now, you might as >well do it the >right way from the outset.Yeah, that's one of our biggest design concerns, and is why we can't pick some arbitrary syntax just because it might 'look better'. Do you happen to have a URL that would talk more about this aspect?Grant Hulbert, Director of Engineering ********************************** Smith Micro, Internet Solutions Div | eCommerce (WebCatalog) 16855 West Bernardo Drive, #380 | ------------------------- San Diego, CA 92127 | Software & Site Development Main Line: (858) 675-1106 | http://www.smithmicro.com Fax: (858) 675-0372 **********************************############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Grant Hulbert

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) Grepping to remove text & code (2004) OT: Outsourcing & copyrights (2005) searchable list archive (1997) Do the [date] thing... (2001) Need relative path explanation (1997) redirect with frames (1997) Navigator 4.01 (1997) Counting LineItems (2000) FileMaker Pro (1999) Okay, I give up... (1999) [WebDNA] Server room @ SmithMicro (2008) emailer (1997) form crasehes server (1997) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) find with exceptions (1997) Error handling for accountNum (1997) Applescript, WebDNA, and PDF (1997) en/decrypt problem (1999)