Re: What am I doing wrong?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29992
interpreted = N
texte = Thanks for the reply Mike. I tried this to no avail:[include file=bob.txt]Only the tag comes back.Mike Davis wrote:> > No, none of this advice should make a bit of difference. The> comment does not have to be in the , and> [INCLUDE] contexts do not need to be in the . Webcatalog knows> nothing of HTML structure. All Webcat tags will work in any relation to the> HTML on the page, so long as the Webcat tags themselves are syntactically> correct in relation to themselves. In your case I suspect either improper> suffix mapping on the server or adding the file= part to the include such as> [include file=bob.txt]> > Mike> > > take the WC tag out of the .> > put it in tags. And put > >> > >> > >> [include bob.txt]> >> > >> > >>> >> But all that returns when I hit the page is the include tag:> >>> >> [include bob.txt]> >>> >> bob.txt is a one word text file and I'm sure that it's in the right> >> directory!> >>> >> If the TeaRoom and other WebCatalog pages work then my page should work> >> too, right? What am I doing wrong? Thanks!> >>> > -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list
.> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to -------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Thanks for the reply Mike. I tried this to no avail:[include file=bob.txt]Only the tag comes back.Mike Davis wrote:> > No, none of this advice should make a bit of difference. The> comment does not have to be in the , and> [include] contexts do not need to be in the . Webcatalog knows> nothing of HTML structure. All Webcat tags will work in any relation to the> HTML on the page, so long as the Webcat tags themselves are syntactically> correct in relation to themselves. In your case I suspect either improper> suffix mapping on the server or adding the file= part to the include such as> [include file=bob.txt]> > Mike> > > take the WC tag out of the .> > put it in tags. And put > >> > >> > >> [include bob.txt]> >> > >> > >>> >> But all that returns when I hit the page is the include tag:> >>> >> [include bob.txt]> >>> >> bob.txt is a one word text file and I'm sure that it's in the right> >> directory!> >>> >> If the TeaRoom and other WebCatalog pages work then my page should work> >> too, right? What am I doing wrong? Thanks!> >>> > -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to -------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Bob McPeak
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[WebDNA] Processor Maxing out (2010)
Emailer question (1998)
WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997)
Help name our technology! (1997)
reversing the effects of [url] (1997)
Suggestions (1998)
Re[2]: back button loses cart (2000)
Great product and great job ! (1997)
ANother SHOWIF problem (1997)
Date Comparison (1998)
Rhapsody? (1997)
PIXO support (1997)
Re2: Calculating multiple shipping... (1997)
French Webcat User (2002)
[append] vs. [appendfile] delta + question? (1997)
WebCat editing, SiteGuard & SiteEdit (1997)
Micro-managing External Links (2006)
Templates on Unix & CGI on Mac? (1997)
THANKS (1997)
NT 4.0/IIS WebCat Installation (1998)