Performance Issue

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 30881
interpreted = N
texte = WebCat 3.0.8 Plug-in Mac OS8.1 Web* 4.2 60 megs allocated to Web*I have a notable time delay when adding to a cart on the above configuration. All other functions run quickly and smoothly. ACGI of Plug-In are the same speed. Is this normal, can it be made faster? Is it my imagination or did v2.x perform this function quicker? -- Stuart TremainDigital Imaging Division The Ad-Libitum Group 48 Victoria Street North Sydney 2060 Australia Phone: +612 9959 5633 Fax: +612 9929 4146email: stuartt@adlib.com.au http://www.adlib.com.au------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebCat Performance Issue (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  2. WebCat Performance Issue (Vince Medina 2000)
  3. Re: Performance Issue (Stuart Tremain 2000)
  4. Re: Performance Issue (Mike Davis 2000)
  5. Re: Performance Issue (Stuart Tremain 2000)
  6. Re: Performance Issue (Jay Gonzales 2000)
  7. Re: Performance Issue (Stuart Tremain 2000)
  8. Re: Performance Issue (Mike Davis 2000)
  9. Re: Performance Issue (Alex McCombie 2000)
  10. Re: Performance Issue (Stuart Tremain 2000)
  11. Re: Performance Issue (WebDNA Support 2000)
  12. Re: Performance Issue (Stuart Tremain 2000)
  13. Re: Performance Issue (WebDNA Support 2000)
  14. Re: Performance Issue (Stuart Tremain 2000)
  15. Re: Performance Issue (WebDNA Support 2000)
  16. Performance Issue (Stuart Tremain 2000)
  17. Speed/performance issues using .hdr (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  18. Re: Speed/performance issues using .hdr (John Hill 1997)
WebCat 3.0.8 Plug-in Mac OS8.1 Web* 4.2 60 megs allocated to Web*I have a notable time delay when adding to a cart on the above configuration. All other functions run quickly and smoothly. ACGI of Plug-In are the same speed. Is this normal, can it be made faster? Is it my imagination or did v2.x perform this function quicker? -- Stuart TremainDigital Imaging Division The Ad-Libitum Group 48 Victoria Street North Sydney 2060 Australia Phone: +612 9959 5633 Fax: +612 9929 4146email: stuartt@adlib.com.au http://www.adlib.com.au------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Stuart Tremain

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) Trouble with formula.db (1997) Search results templates (1996) webcat 4.5 (2003) WCS Newbie question (1997) Email notification to one of multiple vendors ? (1997) searchable list archive (1997) [SHOWIF]s and empty arguments (1997) Emailer (1997) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997) WebCat2b12--[searchstring] bug (1997) E-mail Attachments (1997) Sorry another test - please ignore (2005) slow site (2003) [addfields] bombing 5.0 (2003) WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997) error: Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997) Num Sort Descending (2004) [TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997) A simple email page? (1999)