Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 31212
interpreted = N
texte = > The more I think about it, the less I like the idea of a system > option that > turns off the secure mode of operation. With that in place, no one who > currently uses this feature will stop using it, so the same > people will bitch > and moan when WebCat5 comes out! And I dislike having the new tags use a > version specific flag, because it is just asking for trouble for the next > version.Why can't we just use [text &secure=f] seems so simple to me? it's not version specific as it would work for the issues they are talking about. Jesse Proudman - NineWire Productions http://www.ninewire.com <-> jesse@ninewire.com Innovative and Creative Web Design and Hosting############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re[3]: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  2. Re[2]: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  3. Re[2]: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  4. Re: Re[2]: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  5. Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Mike Davis 2000)
  6. Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  7. Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  8. Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  9. Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  10. Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
> The more I think about it, the less I like the idea of a system > option that > turns off the secure mode of operation. With that in place, no one who > currently uses this feature will stop using it, so the same > people will bitch > and moan when WebCat5 comes out! And I dislike having the new tags use a > version specific flag, because it is just asking for trouble for the next > version.Why can't we just use [text &secure=f] seems so simple to me? it's not version specific as it would work for the issues they are talking about. Jesse Proudman - NineWire Productions http://www.ninewire.com <-> jesse@ninewire.com Innovative and Creative Web Design and Hosting############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Jesse Proudman

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Text data with spaces in them... (1997) SSL Certs (2003) Plugin or CGI or both (1997) Virtual hosting and webcatNT (1997) table on windows webdna 6.0a (2007) serial number dishing (1997) Plugin or CGI or both (1997) WC2b15 File Corruption (1997) Append..... doesn't (2000) frustrated with search (2001) NTbeta18 corrupted? (1997) logging in a user (1999) Getting total number of items ordered (1997) Two stores, one server (1998) Error: Error: expected [/APPLICATION] ??? (1998) unable to launch acgi in WebCat (1997) OT - quiet on the list today - here's something (2004) emailer (1997) RE: Need Help (1998) same bill to and ship to? (1998)