Re: Linux Beta4 problems with multirecord returns

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 32236
interpreted = N
texte = >It appears that the construct [max] is evil. As soon as it appears in >any page, bad things happen, except within [FormVariables]. I added >the following to the top of my page:I think I see it now. Looks like the new aggregate functions in searches interfere with the existing max. I may have to change the new [min field], [max field], [avg field], and [sum field] to other names.Grant Hulbert, Director of Engineering ********************************** Smith Micro, Internet Solutions Div | eCommerce (WebCatalog) 16855 West Bernardo Drive, #380 | ------------------------- San Diego, CA 92127 | Software & Site Development Main Line: (858) 675-1106 | http://www.smithmicro.com Fax: (858) 675-0372 **********************************############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Linux Beta4 problems with multirecord returns (John Peacock 2000)
  2. Re: Linux Beta4 problems with multirecord returns (GHulbert@smithmicro.com 2000)
  3. Re: Linux Beta4 problems with multirecord returns (John Peacock 2000)
  4. Re: Linux Beta4 problems with multirecord returns (GHulbert@smithmicro.com 2000)
  5. Re: Linux Beta4 problems with multirecord returns (John Peacock 2000)
  6. Re: Linux Beta4 problems with multirecord returns (GHulbert@smithmicro.com 2000)
  7. Re: Linux Beta4 problems with multirecord returns (John Peacock 2000)
  8. Linux Beta4 problems with multirecord returns (John Peacock 2000)
>It appears that the construct [max] is evil. As soon as it appears in >any page, bad things happen, except within [formvariables]. I added >the following to the top of my page:I think I see it now. Looks like the new aggregate functions in searches interfere with the existing max. I may have to change the new [min field], [max field], [avg field], and [sum field] to other names.Grant Hulbert, Director of Engineering ********************************** Smith Micro, Internet Solutions Div | eCommerce (WebCatalog) 16855 West Bernardo Drive, #380 | ------------------------- San Diego, CA 92127 | Software & Site Development Main Line: (858) 675-1106 | http://www.smithmicro.com Fax: (858) 675-0372 **********************************############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to GHulbert@smithmicro.com

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Summary layout (1997) [WebDNA] Need to convert unix date? (2009) autosensing lanague selection (1997) vs (1997) [WebDNA] talklist archives don't search/find recent posts? (2008) Spawn doesn't work as advertised ... (2000) Using WebMerchant Only? (1998) Weird problems with [SHOWIF]s (1997) Bug Report, maybe (1997) writing checkboxes to a database (2000) service stop and restart (1997) Reversed words (1997) Newbie Question about seeting price to 0 (1998) WebCat2b12--[searchstring] bug (1997) problems with 2 tags (1997) popups, netscape vs explorer (1997) Help name our technology! I found it (1997) replacing founditems ... (2002) WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997) Support ?? (1997)