Re: $flushcache causes crash

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 32599
interpreted = N
texte = >The new code has also modified the WebDNA tag parser significantly to >accommodate the new XML-style syntax. We have not seen any problems >related to this so far, but it seems that few people are using the >new syntax, so we have to rely on internal testing more than usual. >Even classic syntax may be affected, so beta testers should be alert >to any semantic differences that appear in existing code.What 'classic syntax' is going to break now? ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Beta less tested (was $flushcache causes crash) (Clement Ross 2000)
  2. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  3. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Robie Blair 2000)
  4. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Michael Winston 2000)
  5. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  6. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  7. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  8. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Michael Winston 2000)
  9. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  10. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Dale LaFountain 2000)
  11. Re: $flushcache causes crash (GHulbert@smithmicro.com 2000)
  12. $flushcache causes crash (Dale LaFountain 2000)
>The new code has also modified the WebDNA tag parser significantly to >accommodate the new XML-style syntax. We have not seen any problems >related to this so far, but it seems that few people are using the >new syntax, so we have to rely on internal testing more than usual. >Even classic syntax may be affected, so beta testers should be alert >to any semantic differences that appear in existing code.What 'classic syntax' is going to break now? ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

The code, one more time. (2003) Design Help Needed (1998) Possible Bug in 2.0b15.acgi (1997) Form/HTML Help (2000) US Postal Service and United Parcel Service XML Lookups (2003) WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997) frames & carts (1997) [ConvertChars] problem (1997) Share Snippet? (1999) [WebDNA] Emailer with TLS & Authentication (2020) restart needed???? (1997) (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) suffix mapping for NT? (1997) Grep question [parsing variables] problem (2003) I'm Baaaaaaaaaack - Questions! (2000) Nesting format tags (1997) [SearchString] problem with [search] context (1997) newcart (1997) email program problem (1998)