Re: Variable security

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 33461
interpreted = N
texte = >Where is this logic? Why the absence of a consistent policy on variables? >Why would one variable type have the ability to be overridden and the other >is not, are math variables more important or more dangerous?On the beta list SM said it would be too much work to make their variable hierarchy consistent ... which basically means it really doesn't matter if it's the right thing to do or not, it's never going to happen. >Please rethink this policy and open the language instead of closing it.Hahahahaha! I like your recent posts, Bob, they are fun to read ... :) ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: math variable security [MEDIUM LONG] (Bob Minor 2000)
  2. Re: math variable security [MEDIUM LONG] (John Peacock 2000)
  3. Re: math variable security [MEDIUM LONG] (Bob Minor 2000)
  4. Re: math variable security [VERY LONG] (John Peacock 2000)
  5. Re: Variable security (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  6. Re: Variable security (Bob Minor 2000)
  7. Re: Variable security (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  8. Re: Variable security (Bob Minor 2000)
  9. Re: Variable security (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  10. Variable security (Bob Minor 2000)
  11. Variable security (Bob Minor 2000)
  12. Re: math variable security (Paul Uttermohlen 2000)
  13. Re: math variable security (Bob Minor 2000)
  14. Re: math variable security (WebDNA Support 2000)
  15. Re: math variable security (Bob Minor 2000)
  16. Re: math variable security (WebDNA Support 2000)
  17. math variable security (Bob Minor 2000)
>Where is this logic? Why the absence of a consistent policy on variables? >Why would one variable type have the ability to be overridden and the other >is not, are math variables more important or more dangerous?On the beta list SM said it would be too much work to make their variable hierarchy consistent ... which basically means it really doesn't matter if it's the right thing to do or not, it's never going to happen. >Please rethink this policy and open the language instead of closing it.Hahahahaha! I like your recent posts, Bob, they are fun to read ... :) ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

DNS Lookup 2 (2000) Pre-flight public flag (1997) First n words (2000) Major Security Hole (1998) Using WC for Bulk Emailings (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997) OT - quiet on the list today - here's something (2004) select multiple (1997) WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997) show me your store ! (2003) Formulas.db + Users.db (1997) Interfacing WebMerchant to www.fedex.com (1997) WC1.6 to WC2 date formatting -FIXED! (1997) Banner DNA (1997) empty shopping cart message (1997) Escape the Root! (2002) Test, please ignore (2004) Runtime (1998) Review comparison by PC Magazine: Open for On-line Business (1997) Performance Issue (2000)