Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 35522
interpreted = N
texte = I would then suspect that issueing this tag will first flush the database to disk, then lock it? Otherwise it's pointless I think... -- Sincerely, Bob Sneidar Systems Manager The Word For Today> From: Glenn Busbin > Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:39:10 > To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Subject: Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? > > I found this in the archives. It's from 1998, so it must apply to WC3. > >>> Is [ExclusiveLock] an officially supported tag now? >> It's not officially supported yet, but we believe it won't harm >> anything to use it either. We want to make it multidatabase-aware >> before we officially announce it and roll it into the product. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  2. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (Emily Bonck 2000)
  3. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  4. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (John Peacock 2000)
  5. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  6. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  7. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (ShrPAUL1@aol.com 2000)
  8. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (Bob Sneidar 2000)
  9. Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (Glenn Busbin 2000)
  10. exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? (John Butler 2000)
I would then suspect that issueing this tag will first flush the database to disk, then lock it? Otherwise it's pointless I think... -- Sincerely, Bob Sneidar Systems Manager The Word For Today> From: Glenn Busbin > Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:39:10 > To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Subject: Re: exclusive db lock with webcat-3 ? > > I found this in the archives. It's from 1998, so it must apply to WC3. > >>> Is [exclusivelock] an officially supported tag now? >> It's not officially supported yet, but we believe it won't harm >> anything to use it either. We want to make it multidatabase-aware >> before we officially announce it and roll it into the product. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Bob Sneidar

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

AddLineItem Problem (1997) TCPConnect / Current Temperature (2004) price carry over (1997) showif and cart (1997) RE: WebCatalog2 for NT Beta Request (1997) FlushDatabase Suggestion (1998) Text limits in NT version? (1997) no [search] with NT (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] (1997) Showif, Hideif reverse logic ? (1997) [WebDNA] server admin newbie: what does webdna need owner to be to allow writing? (2010) Include an include file as raw webDNA (2002) multipart part 2 (2004) WebCatalog NT beta 18 problem (1997) RAM variables (1997) Ampersand Character (&) (1997) mass mailing (1998) [OT] Linux -> Winderz (2005) [WebDNA] Authorize working connection... (2019) Major Security Hole (solution with Welcome) (1998)