Re: Suggestion: appendfounditems
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 40542
interpreted = N
texte = ...to append my last statement...I think what Natai is looking for is a[appendacopyoffounditems] ;-)though this is bit long of a context. DonovanDonovan wrote:> No there isn't but I don't believe this will copy unspecified fields like > Natai suggested. It would instead make a new record and insert just the > items that are specified (fieldname=[var]) and leave the others blank. > I think the benefit for this type of thing is that you don't > have to link up all the fields that are going to be the same... only the different > ones. So a function that needs to copy 20 fields with only the [sku] changing > would be something like: > [appendfounditems]ID=[newID]&sku=[theSKU][/appendfounditems] > > no db peramiter nor name value pairs. > Donovan > > Will Starck wrote: > > > Maybe what we need is an &append=T parameter for the [replacefounditems] > > context instead (there isn't one, is there?) > > > > -- >-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
...to append my last statement...I think what Natai is looking for is a[appendacopyoffounditems] ;-)though this is bit long of a context. DonovanDonovan wrote:> No there isn't but I don't believe this will copy unspecified fields like > Natai suggested. It would instead make a new record and insert just the > items that are specified (fieldname=[var]) and leave the others blank. > I think the benefit for this type of thing is that you don't > have to link up all the fields that are going to be the same... only the different > ones. So a function that needs to copy 20 fields with only the [sku] changing > would be something like: > [appendfounditems]ID=[newID]&sku=[theSKU][/appendfounditems] > > no db peramiter nor name value pairs. > Donovan > > Will Starck wrote: > > > Maybe what we need is an &append=T parameter for the [replacefounditems] > > context instead (there isn't one, is there?) > > > > -- >-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Donovan
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997)
listfiles sort by moddate (2002)
[group] ? (1997)
Multiple Pulldowns (1997)
Only charge card when product shipped ? (1997)
WebMerchant when CC network is down (1998)
Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997)
WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997)
WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996)
Is there an easier way? (1998)
Paths (2000)
Extended [ConvertChars] (1997)
Search minus first found (1999)
PLEASE REMOVE MY EMAIL ADDRESS (1997)
b12 cannot limit records returned and more. (1997)
Verisigns SDK (pay flo pro) (2002)
Buying sans cart (1997)
RE: WebCat: Access denied, but why? (1997)
Re:UPS, FEDEX TRACKING (1999)
Nested tags count question (1997)