Re: Feature req.

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 41793
interpreted = N
texte = At 9:37 AM 7/20/02, Kenneth Grome wrote:>>Other than the multiple substitutions and the lack of a case=F >>parameter, this was addressed in WC 4.x via [grep >>search=a&replace=b]. GREP implements a standard and flexible >>implementation of what you're asking for.>>>>I think SMSI would balk at your proposed syntax for multiple from >>and to parameters - no other context in WebDNA supports multiple >>occurrences of the same parameter, and sequence of parameters is >>always not important.>>You are wrong on both counts.>>WebDNA *absolutely* requires two parameters with the same name when >doing a rn comparison. Look it up in the docs and you'll see what >I mean.>>Not only that, but the order of these two same name parameters is >critical to the proper function of the range search. The smaller >value *must* appear first or the range comparison will fail to >produce the proper results.I don't know what docs you're looking in, Ken... the ones I see show the rn syntax as rnZipCodedata=92069 93090 -- that's only one occurrence of the rn parameter, with two values provided. The sequence of the values is important, but not the sequence of the parameter pairs (i.e. you can put the rn parameter before or after the db parameter with no change to the reqults).There are completely different parameters specified for those who choose to provide the min and max values as separate parameters - mr and xr.Look it up in the docs and you'll see what I mean.- brian-- <= Brian C. Fries, BrainScan Software http://www.brainscansoftware.com =><= Macintosh, Internet and Multimedia http://www.artsofauburn.com =><= Development and Consulting =>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: Feature req. (Kenneth Grome 2002)
[table] (was Re: Feature req.) (Rob Marquardt 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Brian Fries 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Andrew Simpson 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Scott Anderson 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Andrew Simpson 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Donovan Brooke 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Donovan Brooke 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Scott Anderson 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Kenneth Grome 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Kenneth Grome 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Alain Russell 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Scott Anderson 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Brian Fries 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Clint Davis 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Stuart Tremain 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Kenneth Grome 2002)
Re: Feature req. (John Peacock 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
Re: Feature req. (John Peacock 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Brian Fries 2002)
Re: Feature req. (dale's stuff 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
Re: Feature req. (John Peacock 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Aaron Lynch 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2002)
Re: Feature req. (John Peacock 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Brian Fries 2002)
Re: Feature req. (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2002)
Feature req. (Aaron Lynch 2002)

At 9:37 AM 7/20/02, Kenneth Grome wrote:>>Other than the multiple substitutions and the lack of a case=F >>parameter, this was addressed in WC 4.x via [grep >>search=a&replace=b]. GREP implements a standard and flexible >>implementation of what you're asking for.>>>>I think SMSI would balk at your proposed syntax for multiple from >>and to parameters - no other context in WebDNA supports multiple >>occurrences of the same parameter, and sequence of parameters is >>always not important.>>You are wrong on both counts.>>WebDNA *absolutely* requires two parameters with the same name when >doing a rn comparison. Look it up in the docs and you'll see what >I mean.>>Not only that, but the order of these two same name parameters is >critical to the proper function of the range search. The smaller >value *must* appear first or the range comparison will fail to >produce the proper results.I don't know what docs you're looking in, Ken... the ones I see show the rn syntax as rnZipCodedata=92069 93090 -- that's only one occurrence of the rn parameter, with two values provided. The sequence of the values is important, but not the sequence of the parameter pairs (i.e. you can put the rn parameter before or after the db parameter with no change to the reqults).There are completely different parameters specified for those who choose to provide the min and max values as separate parameters - mr and xr.Look it up in the docs and you'll see what I mean.- brian-- <= Brian C. Fries, BrainScan Software http://www.brainscansoftware.com =><= Macintosh, Internet and Multimedia http://www.artsofauburn.com =><= Development and Consulting =>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Brian Fries

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: Feature req.

2002

Top Articles:

Related Readings: