Re: chat opinion ...

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 42634
interpreted = N
texte = My 2 cents (USD, of course):1) The fact that SM had a chat at all was cool and definitely a step in the right direction, however, as Ken pointed out, many various things about the nature of chats themselves (scheduling, hard to follow, etc. etc.) make it a not-so-ideal medium to conduct serious business and/or research IMHO.2) This list is cool too, and, yes, I know it's archived, but I think the idea of a 'Forum' (basically a threaded message board requiring registration) where we hold these discussions would be the best of both worlds. We could discuss and also archive at the same time, while allowing the subject matter (WebDNA) to be more visable and therefore accessible and therefore less scary to newbies who will (hopefully) therefore begin to start coding in it faster and then we can all therefore start getting filthy stinking rich and sip Spring Fever Fizzes off of naked island women's bellies while Ken Grome's sweatshop cranks out line after line of code for the cost of the little umbrellas in our drinks!!!!!! .....BWAHA HA HA!!!Ahem, excuse me... sorry about that. Seriously, I think that Sal's vision of the forum is an excellent idea from a marketing standpoint and I'm all for it.3) I don't know what will happen to the list. Maybe it will die. Maybe not. Any ideas on that? Really, what would be the use of an email-based talklist when we have the forum running?-Dan ------------------------------------------- http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  2. Re: chat opinion ... (dale's stuff 2002)
  3. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  4. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  5. Re: chat opinion ... (Howard Wolosky 2002)
  6. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  7. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  8. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  9. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  10. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  11. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  12. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  13. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  14. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  15. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  16. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  17. Re: chat opinion ... (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  18. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  19. chat opinion ... (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  20. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 1996)
My 2 cents (USD, of course):1) The fact that SM had a chat at all was cool and definitely a step in the right direction, however, as Ken pointed out, many various things about the nature of chats themselves (scheduling, hard to follow, etc. etc.) make it a not-so-ideal medium to conduct serious business and/or research IMHO.2) This list is cool too, and, yes, I know it's archived, but I think the idea of a 'Forum' (basically a threaded message board requiring registration) where we hold these discussions would be the best of both worlds. We could discuss and also archive at the same time, while allowing the subject matter (WebDNA) to be more visable and therefore accessible and therefore less scary to newbies who will (hopefully) therefore begin to start coding in it faster and then we can all therefore start getting filthy stinking rich and sip Spring Fever Fizzes off of naked island women's bellies while Ken Grome's sweatshop cranks out line after line of code for the cost of the little umbrellas in our drinks!!!!!! .....BWAHA HA HA!!!Ahem, excuse me... sorry about that. Seriously, I think that Sal's vision of the forum is an excellent idea from a marketing standpoint and I'm all for it.3) I don't know what will happen to the list. Maybe it will die. Maybe not. Any ideas on that? Really, what would be the use of an email-based talklist when we have the forum running?-Dan ------------------------------------------- http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Dan Strong

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Bug? (1997) Trouble with formula.db (1997) Multiple 'Users.db' files not possible (1997) The old multiple selection bit (2000) ShowNext & Showif together (1999) WebCatalog and WebTen (1997) E-Mailer (WebCatb15acgiMac) (1997) RE: Error: template (1997) Me know logical no need Now totally OT (2002) Email Not Being Sent (2004) File dates in WebCatalog .tmpl/.inc (1997) WebCAT MacOS9 --> OSX (2003) Quickie question on the email templates (1997) [WebDNA] how to purge webdna cache of templates? (2009) OT: Unix Geek Needed (2005) XML Parse with XML WebDNA Syntax... (2004) [WebDNA] Correct 301 codes (2015) Help name our technology! (1997) 2 easy questions re: [showif] and [sendmail] (1997) Date search and sendmail (1997)