Re: Off-Topic: Optimal WebSTAR settings for WebDNA plugin v4.5

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 45246
interpreted = N
texte = Tim, I guess I wasn't reccommending 20. I'm sure this setting can be fine tuned for the individual needs. We get about 20 orders per day from the server I was reffering to so we don't need a lot of connections.I actually don't know what kind of impact setting a higher setting makes. Maybe nothing. If not, I agree. If you have the RAM, might as well set it high.My point mostly was that these settings seem to be magical... (in the way that the only feedback I've ever seen to this question is speculative.)DonovanTim Robinson wrote:> On recommending a max of 20... i find that surprising. My other work server > I would characterise as moderately busy but certainly not > motherboard-meltdown busy. It regularly goes over 20 connections and often > goes over 40. If you've got the RAM why would you risk displaying an error > message by not specifying a higher number of max connections? > > Regards, > Tim ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Off-Topic: Optimal WebSTAR settings for WebDNA plugin v4.5 (Claude Gelinas 2002)
  2. Re: Off-Topic: Optimal WebSTAR settings for WebDNA plugin v4.5 (Donovan home EHG 2002)
  3. Re: Off-Topic: Optimal WebSTAR settings for WebDNA plugin v4.5 (Tim Robinson 2002)
  4. Re: Off-Topic: Optimal WebSTAR settings for WebDNA plugin v4.5 (Donovan 2002)
  5. Re: Off-Topic: Optimal WebSTAR settings for WebDNA plugin v4.5 (Tim Robinson 2002)
  6. Off-Topic: Optimal WebSTAR settings for WebDNA plugin v4.5 (Kenneth Grome 2002)
Tim, I guess I wasn't reccommending 20. I'm sure this setting can be fine tuned for the individual needs. We get about 20 orders per day from the server I was reffering to so we don't need a lot of connections.I actually don't know what kind of impact setting a higher setting makes. Maybe nothing. If not, I agree. If you have the RAM, might as well set it high.My point mostly was that these settings seem to be magical... (in the way that the only feedback I've ever seen to this question is speculative.)DonovanTim Robinson wrote:> On recommending a max of 20... i find that surprising. My other work server > I would characterise as moderately busy but certainly not > motherboard-meltdown busy. It regularly goes over 20 connections and often > goes over 40. If you've got the RAM why would you risk displaying an error > message by not specifying a higher number of max connections? > > Regards, > Tim ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Donovan home EHG

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

plugin-acgi, different results (1997) MacAuthorize and WebMerchant (1997) Checking Out! (1999) japanese characters (1997) Disappearing records (2002) Causes Site to Crash... (2000) Quit revisited (1997) 2.0Beta Command Ref (can't find this instruction) (1997) Postprocessing CCs (2000) form image (2000) Editing the search string (1997) Backwards list behavior ... (1997) What file? (1997) Webcat table size. (2001) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) RAM variables (1997) WebDNA 4.5.1 Now Available (2003) A good idea? (1998) hidden (phantom) file downloads (2000)