Re: [OT] Industry standard for missing orders

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 46971
interpreted = N
texte = I would just make orders going to an apartment require a signature.- charlesOn Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 10:52 PM, WJ Starck wrote:> Good evening- > > Was wondering if there is an industry standard of sorts for orders > that are shipped, show they are delivered, but are claimed to not have > been received by the customer. Problem is, the vast majority of our > orders are received without incident. We ship via US priority mail > because it is a convenience for our customers to receive orders > without having to sign for them, and I feel this gives us a > competitive edge. We currently use USPS delivery confirmation which > has worked quite well for us. > > *However* > > Lately, we seem to have an increasing number of packages that the > customers claim they have never received, even though the USPS > tracking says they were delivered. Most commonly, these are delivered > to apartments. The last two have been in the NYC area. After > invesigation, it turns out the package was delivered, but the postal > worker either left the package without obtaining a signature, or left > it in the care of the manager, who left it out in the hallway because > it didn't look expensive. I'm beginning to wonder if we're being > taken for a ride. > > So what to do? > > - I know we can insure all packages, but this seems costly since the > vast majority are delivered without incident. > - Insist that all apartment dwellers insure their packages at their > cost? > - Insist on the above in high risk fraud states/cities? (NY, New > Jersey,Miami, California) > - Tell the customer tough luck it's out of our hands.? > - Or ? > > > Any one who's been there, done that care to comment? Our average order > runs about $75.00 > > Thanks, > > > -- > > Will Starck > NovaDerm Skincare Science > http://www.novaderm.com > wjs@novaderm.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [OT] Industry standard for missing orders (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  2. Re: [OT] Industry standard for missing orders (Charles Kline 2003)
  3. Re: [OT] Industry standard for missing orders (dale 2003)
  4. Re: [OT] Industry standard for missing orders (Donovan 2003)
  5. [OT] Industry standard for missing orders (WJ Starck 2003)
I would just make orders going to an apartment require a signature.- charlesOn Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 10:52 PM, WJ Starck wrote:> Good evening- > > Was wondering if there is an industry standard of sorts for orders > that are shipped, show they are delivered, but are claimed to not have > been received by the customer. Problem is, the vast majority of our > orders are received without incident. We ship via US priority mail > because it is a convenience for our customers to receive orders > without having to sign for them, and I feel this gives us a > competitive edge. We currently use USPS delivery confirmation which > has worked quite well for us. > > *However* > > Lately, we seem to have an increasing number of packages that the > customers claim they have never received, even though the USPS > tracking says they were delivered. Most commonly, these are delivered > to apartments. The last two have been in the NYC area. After > invesigation, it turns out the package was delivered, but the postal > worker either left the package without obtaining a signature, or left > it in the care of the manager, who left it out in the hallway because > it didn't look expensive. I'm beginning to wonder if we're being > taken for a ride. > > So what to do? > > - I know we can insure all packages, but this seems costly since the > vast majority are delivered without incident. > - Insist that all apartment dwellers insure their packages at their > cost? > - Insist on the above in high risk fraud states/cities? (NY, New > Jersey,Miami, California) > - Tell the customer tough luck it's out of our hands.? > - Or ? > > > Any one who's been there, done that care to comment? Our average order > runs about $75.00 > > Thanks, > > > -- > > Will Starck > NovaDerm Skincare Science > http://www.novaderm.com > wjs@novaderm.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Charles Kline

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Error:Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997) [WebDNA] Crashing again (2008) [purgeDatabase], [replaceChars] and others ... (1997) [WebDNA] Trigger stops executing (2017) Notepad problems (1998) WebDNA wholesale ... (2002) Quit revisited (1997) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) orderfile and setlineitems (1998) Running WebCat on a Virtual Server (2008) Addlineitems ... grrr (2004) WebDNA tables and commas (2004) Testing the WebCat Email List Members (2000) [UPPERCASE] (1997) Here we go again... (2006) [WebDNA] Need to get off! (2008) [WebDNA] NoSQL: sharing some ideas (2013) Problems passing [SKU] with $Replace in 2.0 (1997) [REPLACE] inside [FOUNDITEMS] (1998) Shipping [grandtotal] solution (1997)