Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 47301
interpreted = N
texte = On 1/31/03 12:24 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote:[snip] > > If you stop using the searchstring tag and adopt a different > approach, there is only one simple rule to follow: > > Every search context variable MUST > appear in every shownext URL.Thank you Ken, that took care of the problem.The aggravating part had been that I'd used the same code on another project and it worked fine. And I was able to see what searchstring was passing because it was in the html string. It looked correct and the startat in the string was correct and incremented... It just didn't work on the page. Go figure.Anyway, thanks again. You made my morning.Cheers, Lurch Webmaster and Virtual Barkeep Emeritus... ...Lover of fine whisky, fast women, and faster airplanes... ...not necessarily in that order :P ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment (Marko Bernyk 2003)
  2. Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment (Marko Bernyk 2003)
  3. Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  4. Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment (Donovan 2003)
  5. Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment (John Peacock 2003)
  6. Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment (Donovan 2003)
  7. Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment (Joe R. Richardson 2003)
  8. Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment (Joe R. Richardson 2003)
  9. Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment (John Peacock 2003)
  10. Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  11. Re: Help getting [shownext] to increment (John Peacock 2003)
  12. Help getting [shownext] to increment (Joe R. Richardson 2003)
On 1/31/03 12:24 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote:[snip] > > If you stop using the searchstring tag and adopt a different > approach, there is only one simple rule to follow: > > Every search context variable MUST > appear in every shownext URL.Thank you Ken, that took care of the problem.The aggravating part had been that I'd used the same code on another project and it worked fine. And I was able to see what searchstring was passing because it was in the html string. It looked correct and the startat in the string was correct and incremented... It just didn't work on the page. Go figure.Anyway, thanks again. You made my morning.Cheers, Lurch Webmaster and Virtual Barkeep Emeritus... ...Lover of fine whisky, fast women, and faster airplanes... ...not necessarily in that order :P ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Joe R. Richardson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

setitems, one more thing (1997) Appended records getting deleted (in BannerSleuth) (2000) WebCat editing, SiteGuard & SiteEdit (1997) test (2003) webcatalog 2.1.3 ACGI Weirdness? (1998) autocommit problem (1998) Not reading code (1997) WebDNA Grep assistance [lowercase] (2003) FAX orders (1996) Re:Emailer and encryption (1997) Switching To NT (1999) Roundup function? (1997) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) LOOP and IF statements (1997) [WebDNA] Add to cart (2014) Bug Report, maybe (1997) [WebDNA] [listwords] seems especially slow (amongst the looping contexts) (2010) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) when is date system date or order date? (1997) A quickie question (1997)