Re: [lookup] speed sales pitch
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53531
interpreted = N
texte = >2. WebCat databases work well, even when they get big, but can get >bogged down with doing date searches, and number searches to a >lesser extent, since the data must be interpreted then compared.This is why I have always been a proponent of storing dates as "days since 0000" because then you can do a simple text search on a date field and it doesn't bog down. This works great for dates that create a "days since 0000" value of 6 digits, which includes dates in anyone's current lifetime.But if you are using a date range that does not create a 6-digit string - such as dates far in the past or a long time in the future - then you would need to do a mathematical comparison of the "days since 0000" value, which is still less overhead than interpreting date stored as formatted MM/DD/YYYY values.-- Sincerely,Kenneth Grome-------------------------------------------------------------Outsource your WebDNA programming for $18 an hour or less!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>2. WebCat databases work well, even when they get big, but can get >bogged down with doing date searches, and number searches to a >lesser extent, since the data must be interpreted then compared.This is why I have always been a proponent of storing dates as "days since 0000" because then you can do a simple text search on a date field and it doesn't bog down. This works great for dates that create a "days since 0000" value of 6 digits, which includes dates in anyone's current lifetime.But if you are using a date range that does not create a 6-digit string - such as dates far in the past or a long time in the future - then you would need to do a mathematical comparison of the "days since 0000" value, which is still less overhead than interpreting date stored as formatted MM/DD/YYYY values.-- Sincerely,Kenneth Grome-------------------------------------------------------------Outsource your WebDNA programming for $18 an hour or less!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Multiple Domains (2003)
RE: Purchased cart being overwritten (1997)
converting tabs (1997)
displaying New products (using [date]) (1997)
Using Cookie for client specific info? (1997)
Developer Edition (2002)
Email notification to one of multiple vendors ? (1997)
Form/HTML Help (2000)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997)
Public beta 3 of WebCatalog 4.0 is now available (2000)
Grep Help (2007)
Enterprise Server (1998)
Frames and WebCat (1997)
Re:HELP - NONE STOP DIGESTS. Digest for 4/24/97) (1997)
WebDNA for Dummies (2007)
problem with waitForFile? (1998)
Navigator 4.01 (1997)
How to remove comments with grep? (2003)
Add a field to the error log? (1997)
color and size options / ARCHIVES (1997)